Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do we have a starting QB announced yet?


saX man
 Share

Recommended Posts

40 minutes ago, SammyFranchise said:

As of now Sam Darnold is winning the starting Job and winning soundly

Rhule is waiting to make the announcement or giving Baker 1 more week to prove he is the guy

from what ive heard if Baker didnt win the Job Panthers were going to release him. But with Corral going down that might change things.

 

I really hope this is just a huddler on an alt having fun because if someone out there actually believes crap like this they just need a lobotomy.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's obvious he will name the starter for the third pre season games. Reps where already starting to lean in favor of Mayfield. I think, now with even less media involvement in the next week of practice, Baker will start getting 90% of the reps, and we will know this "competition" is over. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Smithers said:

Rhule said the starters will play in our final preseason game.  My guess is he names a starting QB after a few practices this week and all the 1s play together.  

Where did he say that? Not doubting it, just want to hear him blubber it from his fat mouth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, SammyFranchise said:

As of now Sam Darnold is winning the starting Job and winning soundly

Rhule is waiting to make the announcement or giving Baker 1 more week to prove he is the guy

from what ive heard if Baker didnt win the Job Panthers were going to release him. But with Corral going down that might change things.

 

Checks out. I believe it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something Panthers media didnt mention is Baker struggled a lot against the Pats. He really couldnt move the ball at all..

While reports of Sam was that he was stuggling and threw picks, he was also the only QB that could move the ball against New Englands ones and apparently had the best drive of the joint practices his final drive 2 min drill. 

 

Rhule is always mentioning "Unconscious Mastery of the System".. Sam is Closer to that than Baker.

 

Both Rhule and Mcadoo want Darnold. Not seeing how Baker wins the Job unless the owners forces him too. 

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SammyFranchise said:

Something Panthers media didnt mention is Baker struggled a lot against the Pats. He really couldnt move the ball at all..

While reports of Sam was that he was stuggling and threw picks, he was also the only QB that could move the ball against New Englands ones and apparently had the best drive of the joint practices his final drive 2 min drill. 

 

Rhule is always mentioning "Unconscious Mastery of the System".. Sam is Closer to that than Baker.

 

Both Rhule and Mcadoo want Darnold. Not seeing how Baker wins the Job unless the owners forces him too. 

This is some weird shtick, mods may need to move in if it keeps up 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SammyFranchise said:

Something Panthers media didnt mention is Baker struggled a lot against the Pats. He really couldnt move the ball at all..

While reports of Sam was that he was stuggling and threw picks, he was also the only QB that could move the ball against New Englands ones and apparently had the best drive of the joint practices his final drive 2 min drill. 

 

Rhule is always mentioning "Unconscious Mastery of the System".. Sam is Closer to that than Baker.

 

Both Rhule and Mcadoo want Darnold. Not seeing how Baker wins the Job unless the owners forces him too. 

That literally isn’t true at all.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It amuses me how Goff's name the last few years is often used to compare to subpar or underperforming QB's. Now on the surface I get it. But when you look at his numbers he's been the same QB all along. He's improved his completion % but even with the Rams he averaged 63.4. And that Super Bowl he played in they should have won honestly. If we can get a QB as good as Goff I'll be pretty damn pleased.
    • And it remains to be seen if Goff has that ability or not. Plenty of very good QB's like Goff were not able to get over those playoff humps. Matt Ryan, Kirk Cousins, etc. You can still be an upper tier QB and never get over that hurdle. McVay just thought(and hasn't been wrong yet) Goff was never going to be that guy.
    • You literally simply have to think logically for either of those guys. Smith is locked up on a deal for 2025, so we would have to trade for him or he gets cut. Neither of those scenarios are likely in the first place.  Wilson will be 37 in 2025. Why on earth would he have any interest in a situation that is far worse than he was given in Denver and wasn't able to win there? He's a guy that can drop into any ready to win franchise in the NFL and immediately elevate their chances of winning(provided they already have QB issues).  Frankly, that is either speculation that even David Newton should be embarrassed by or it shows how disconnected with reality some people in our organization are.   I do agree with him on getting a veteran QB, however. That's our best chance to keep developing our talent.
×
×
  • Create New...