Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corral to IR is a good thing….

Panthers Fan 69

By Panthers Fan 69,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

toldozer Veteran

toldozer

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

Officially forces Rhule to Redshirt him. For him to go from one read zone read to full read and progressions he needs to sit and study. It worked for Rodgers and Mahomes.  THIS IS A GOOD THING 

Yeah him missing a year worth of practice is a good thing.  Now if we suck this year we have no choice but drafting a qb making him 2 wasted picks

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, stbugs said:

They were also 1st round picks with a poo load more talent. Comparing Corral to Wilson because he was a 3rd round pick or Rodgers and Mahomes because he’ll sit a year is a losing strategy. I was hopeful but honestly, he doesn’t look the part and he’s not likely to make big strides this year. I’m right back on my let’s draft a first round QB this year in what appears to be a solid draft class.

We almost have to draft a QB, especially if Baker flops--which in that case Rhule will be fired. Bring in a new coach who gets his guy, and it's conceivable that Corral ends up in the same boat. He's certainly not going to make any big strides this year. Being drafted by the Panthers might have been the worst thing that could've happened to Corral. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, top dawg said:

We almost have to draft a QB, especially if Baker flops--which in that case Rhule will be fired. Bring in a new coach who gets his guy, and it's conceivable that Corral ends up in the same boat. He's certainly not going to make any big strides this year. Being drafted by the Panthers might have been the worst thing that could've happened to Corral. 

That was probably going to happen anyway if he didn't get injured..

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Davidson Deac II Grand Master

Davidson Deac II

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, top dawg said:

We almost have to draft a QB, especially if Baker flops--which in that case Rhule will be fired. Bring in a new coach who gets his guy, and it's conceivable that Corral ends up in the same boat. He's certainly not going to make any big strides this year. Being drafted by the Panthers might have been the worst thing that could've happened to Corral. 

The problem comes if Baker is not a flop, but not great, ie he is somewhere in between.  Then we have to decide whether we draft another qb (assuming we can get one we want), or resign Mayfield, or something else.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...