Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corral heading to IR


Floppin
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, frankw said:

Did half the league field one of the worst starting olines in years last season? If you're glass half full right now that's fine but we are a few steps away from another mess at OL that's just reality.

Yes !! 32 teams in the league.. More then half the league didn't have a fuging top 15 Oline...

Burrows got sacked 60 times remember??

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regardless of the draft picks and what not, I feel bad for Corral.  This a major blow to his career.

1. If he was healthy, he could have played at the end of the year if we were stinking it up to get some quality reps.

2. If Baker does well, he's getting an extension and Matt's career is as a backup at best.

3.  If the Panthers stink, a whole new staff comes in, and they won't want anything to do with him.

He's going to have a very hard time finding his way in the league now.  While he's a millionaire now, I do still feel bad for he competitive kid he is.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NAS said:

And the injury is on Rhule, putting him behind third stringer OL.  Matt should have played first and second quarter and call it a night behind our second stringers

He's our third string QB currently. He's going to play behind 3rd string oline the majority of the time. This argument doesn't make sense.

Edited by Floppin
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NAS said:

And the injury is on Rhule, putting him behind third stringer OL.  Matt should have played first and second quarter and call it a night behind our second stringers

And if 1 of the starting Olinemen got hurt.. Who would you have blamed then???

Again is nobody in the league playing behind 3rd and 4th stringers??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blaming Rhule is funny. Almost every NFL team is playing their 3rd and 4th string offenses this week, and people on here are blaming our end of roster offensive line. Indianapolis is playing some guy named Jack Coan at QB for christ sake.

This was the risk drafting Corral, he is a fragile player. The team babied him and he got hurt anyway. It's unfortunate, but he needs a year of studying and strength training anyway.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Floppin said:

I don't know if you've noticed but the only projected starter to carry over from last years line is Moton. It's a brand new line my guy.

Elflein Daley and Erving are all still here a few plays away from starting last I checked. 17 games is a long season.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nah I wanna see these NFL evaluators talking about his prospects at WR aren't good because I would LOVE to see thier explanations 
    • You do realize that raw stats don't make someone a better or worse player, right? To begin with, the last time I checked, 1,319 is more yards than 1,258, so T-Mac had more yards (but I'll forgive you as a typo there and say you meant catches lol), but that's before even factoring in that Hunter did his in 13 games vs 12 for T-Mac because Arizona didn't make a bowl game. It's also completely ignoring the team around each player.  If you think Hunter having the 8th place finisher in the Heisman voting at QB isn't going to result in helping his top WRs stats, then you're sticking your head in the sand to purposefully not see it. Hunter's QB had 353 completions for 4,134 yards and 37 TDs vs T-Mac's QB who had 260 completions for 2,958 yards and 18 TDs. But sure, let's rank NFL prospects by their stats and say the guy with more catches and TDs is the better prospect.  So on that note, I now change my mind, T-Mac is no longer the best WR in the draft, it's Nick Nash who had 104 rec, 1,382 yards, and 16 TDs, all numbers better than Hunter's... because that's how this is done, right? As I've said before, if someone wants to like a player better than someone else that's totally fair, but come with real reasons, talk about their play, but to talk about things like stats as your reasoning, when you ignore the obvious and massive flaws in using those stats in that way, just makes you look dumb.
    • Nah you don't go out and put up the numbers he did without being able to run routes dude is a football junky so he works on his craft he isn’t THAT much more athletic than other players to just be able to go out and do whatever and succeed at that level 
×
×
  • Create New...