Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Person: Panthers expected to name Baker Mayfield Week 1 starter.


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, Tr3ach said:

This place lol.  They cry about Icky not starting immediately, Rhule wants him to earn his spot, he does and is now the starter, the huddle cries.  The huddle cries that Baker isnt the starting qb, rhule says their is a competition, Baker wins it, Baker is named the starter, and alas, the huddle cries.

Did Brown or Horn have to "earn" their spot

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Did Brown or Horn have to "earn" their spot

4 simple question??

1. Who was the DT or CB who was better holding them off from starting??

2. Do you think BC is a talented player Especially at LT and could have been strong competition for LT starting out??

3. Do you know if transition at LT(from college to pro's)is harder or easier then DT and CB??

4. Could starting BC (who at least is furthur along in his development) at LT made it easier to evaluate the QB position?? Instead having a rookie at a top 3 important position making his mistake in protection while trying to evaluate the QB who were on a Competition...

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WOW!! said:

4 simple question??

1. Who was the DT or CB who was better holding them off from starting??

2. Do you think BC is a talented player Especially at LT and could have been strong competition for LT starting out??

3. Do you know if transition at LT(from college to pro's)is harder or easier then DT and CB??

4. Could starting BC (who at least is furthur along in his development) at LT made it easier to evaluate the QB position?? Instead having a rookie at a top 3 important position making his mistake in protection while trying to evaluate the QB who were on a Competition...

you didnt answer my question

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

4 simple question??

1. Who was the DT or CB who was better holding them off from starting??

2. Do you think BC is a talented player Especially at LT and could have been strong competition for LT starting out??

3. Do you know if transition at LT(from college to pro's)is harder or easier then DT and CB??

4. Could starting BC (who at least is furthur along in his development) at LT made it easier to evaluate the QB position?? Instead having a rookie at a top 3 important position making his mistake in protection while trying to evaluate the QB who were on a Competition...

1. Do we have a better left tackle on our roster then Ekwonu (or a better quarterback than Mayfield)?

2. Good player? Yeah, but the "competition" was still dumb.

3. Probably harder, but that's why you give them as many reps as possible rather than subjecting them to a stupid competition.

4. A professional staff should be able to do both. In fact, many of them do.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

you didnt answer my question

I actually did @mrcompletely11..

If you actually read my post and answer  2 of the questions.. You have your answer why??

2 DT and 2 CB usually start.. Other then a (injured KK) who was Brown's competition?? Same with CB.. Other then DJax who was the other CB on the team to compete with Horn to start??

Answer: There wasn't 1.. Different story for Ickey where you had BC and only 1 LT can start..

Finally the transition for Olinemen from College to Pros is alot harder then DT and CB. This is Reality..

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

I actually did @mrcompletely11..

If you actually read my post and answer  2 of the questions.. You have your answer why??

2 DT and 2 CB usually start.. Other then a (injured KK) who was Brown's competition?? Same with CB.. Other then DJax who was the other CB on the team to compete with Horn to start??

Answer: There wasn't 1.. Different story for Ickey where you had BC and only 1 LT can start..

Finally the transition for Olinemen from College to Pros is alot harder then DT and CB. This is Reality..

so the answer to my question is "NO"

 

Thanks for the excuses though.  I love how you defend rhule

 

how about this, if we had traded for Watson would he be in a competition with darnold?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Pejorative Miscreant said:

Well damn.  90% of the posts on here are complaining about this.  What am I going to read now.   Could’ve just waited a couple days before uncorking this and kept me entertained. 

Friggin Matt Rhule ruins everything…

watch out grouchy old man Razor is going to lay the ban hammer down on those complaining about complaining

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

1. Do we have a better left tackle on our roster then Ekwonu (or a better quarterback than Mayfield)?

2. Good player? Yeah, but the "competition" was still dumb.

3. Probably harder, but that's why you give them as many reps as possible rather than subjecting them to a stupid competition.

4. A professional staff should be able to do both. In fact, many of them do.

1. Yes.. Starting out 1st few weeks.. BC looks better and is more developed and had NFL snaps at the position.. Their is actually video of BC looking better the 1st few weeks of TC then Ikey..

2. Your opinion.. Cool.. But Reality Gross didn't start right away at LT.. Its a hard transition for anybody to make and we're talking 2 weeks and a half of a 6 week process before he was name starter.. Are we really butt hurt over a 2week competition??

3. AGAIN rep Distribution with no actual facts about how 2weeks of shares reps and 4 weeks of 1st reps is different from 6 weeks of 1st reps.. is it that big of a difference??

4. New staff will take adjustments.. But again we're getting to the point where everybody thought we would get to right?? And we're only in week 2 of preseason..

Reality check.. It took Rivera "professional coaching staff " till week 4 of preseason to give CAm the job over Clausen..

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WOW!! said:

1. Yes.. Starting out 1st few weeks.. BC looks better and is more developed and had NFL snaps at the position.. Their is actually video of BC looking better the 1st few weeks of TC then Ikey..

2. Your opinion.. Cool.. But Reality Gross didn't start right away at LT.. Its a hard transition for anybody to make and we're talking 2 weeks and a half of a 6 week process before he was name starter.. Are we really butt hurt over a 2week competition??

3. AGAIN rep Distribution with no actual facts about how 2weeks of shares reps and 4 weeks of 1st reps is different from 6 weeks of 1st reps.. is it that big of a difference??

4. New staff will take adjustments.. But again we're getting to the point where everybody thought we would get to right?? And we're only in week 2 of preseason..

Reality check.. It took Rivera "professional coaching staff " till week 4 of preseason to give CAm the job over Clausen..

1. Then why isn't he starting now?

2. Gross started right away, though not at left tackle. We had a much more viable option there than Brady Christensen at the time. Even so, could he have started? Based on what we know now, I'd say probably.

3. You acknowledge in your previous answer that it's a hard transition and they need a lot of work, yet turn around and defend not giving them as many reps as we could have. It's kind of a weird position.

4. Are we? I suspect we'll have a better answer to that on Week One of the regular season then we do Week Two of the preseason.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Did Brown or Horn have to "earn" their spot

CB and DT are both positions with multiple "starters".  They were also clearly in the top two of those.  LT is different, BC improved a lot in the offseason according to everyone and Icky they clearly want to play LT.  They had a competition and within 2 weeks of pads they decided Icky was good enough to start.  I dont see any problem at all with how that was handled.  If you are talking about Corral then yea, hes nowhere near Baker or even Sam right now.  I know we as fans have a huge emphasis on Corral and his importance to the team but the team looks at him as a third round rookie (as they should).  You have to show something in the snaps you get to earn more.   So far he hasnt, hopefully he will.  The Rhule haters really think that if Corral hadnt showed up and showed out at camp he wouldn't have got more snaps?  The best thing for the team and the coaching staff would have been Corral to show up and be Tom Brady in camp. . That didnt happen yet.  For now he will end up being the third string qb.  No team in the nfl gives their set third string qb a lot of snaps in practice. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

so the answer to my question is "NO"

 

Thanks for the excuses though.  I love how you defend rhule

 

how about this, if we had traded for Watson would he be in a competition with darnold?

I'm sorry @mrcompletely11 I forgot you choose not to be a adult and use "context" in answering questions and having a discussion.. MY bad...

Again understanding the situation is not defending Rhule.. Grow up please??

3.. Do you understand the difference between Mayfield/Darnold and Watson??

Simple analysis would show getting Baker is a 4th round pick and his former team paying most his contract.. Right??

While getting Watson was trading 3 years of 1st 2nd and 3rd round picks, top young players on the roster and 230 mil "guaranteed " contract  .

Do you see the difference why some player wouldn't be in a competition?? Lol

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

1. Then why isn't he starting now?

2. Gross started right away, though not at left tackle. We had a much more viable option there than Brady Christensen at the time. Even so, could he have started? Based on what we know now, I'd say probably.

3. You acknowledge in your previous answer that it's a hard transition and they need a lot of work, yet turn around and defend not giving them as many reps as we could have. It's kind of a weird position.

4. Are we? I suspect we'll have a better answer to that on Week One of the regular season then we do Week Two of the preseason.

1. He showed enough improvement and earn the trust of "James Campen " (a highly  respected Oline coach around the league) that the long term plan to have him at LT is viable now..

2. That's right the number 8th pick LT started at RT his rookie year.. And nobody was up in arms about him not being the Long term LT a year later then Ickey is now..

So let be realistic about the reason this is a issue with some of you now..  You trust Fox over Rhule which is okay and understandable.. But stop acting like some of you are rep experts and know how to run a TC for a pro NFL team...

3. I also Acknowledge that I don't know or have evidence of a major difference between 2weeks of shared reps and 4 weeks of all 1st reps or 6 weeks of 1st reps.. Neither do you.. So why are we  making a big deal about the affect of rep Distribution when we don't know the difference??

4. Exactly... But we still won't because it isn't a simple question to answer...

Example...

Cam shared reps all TC and Preseason then broke every record for Rookie QBS..

Clausen got Alot more 1st team reps his rookie season and sucked...

(I might be wrong about Clausen because I don't remember when Matt went down in preseason)

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • One has a proven, offensive-minded, Super Bowl winning head coach along with a top 5 OL + defense. He's being protected and getting the ball back not having to chase the other teams. The other had Frank Reich + Thomas Brown their rookie year with a bottom 5 defense as well as a bottom 5 OL that gave up the 2nd most sacks against a rookie QB ever. The sophomore season is being ran with a top 5 OL but also with a rookie HC (that has just one year of OC experience) and a bottom 5 defense still. The Broncos defense has allowed over 20pts just three times this season (26 vs. SEA (L), 23 vs. LAC (L), 41 vs. BAL (L)). Meanwhile, the Panthers have had ONE game where the defense gave up less than 20pts (vs. NYG (W)).   I'm not sure how folks couldn't expect Bo Nix to statistically perform better given their incredibly different situations. With that said, I didn't expect Nix to keep ascending as impressively as he has this season. Hopefully his arc will give other older college QBs a better shot, especially given the recent media blitz against the NFL regarding how development of the QB position in the league seems to be non-existent. Hopefully Bryce continues to improve as well, of course.  
    • “You can learn a lot in 10 games,” Nix said. “[I’m] still learning, still growing, but just finding ways to execute the play that’s called, no matter what it is: run play, pass play. It doesn’t matter. Just finding the right way to go with the ball.” To that point, Nix noted how his developing partnership with head coach Sean Payton has helped Denver’s offense get to the next level. “To be honest, I think at the beginning, you kind of make the NFL bigger than what it actually is,” Nix said when asked where he feels he’s made the most strides. “These players are really good, but at the same time, you have really good players on your level. I think simplifying the game, trying to play as fast as possible, and finding a completion, which is what we’ve been able to do here recently. “I think as we’ve gone on, Coach and I have found a good rhythm of what we both like, what we can kind of put out there on the field, and what we can execute. Then the guys have kind of adapted to it, found our roles within the offense, and executed at a high level. It’s just all about slowing the game down and processing things in a manner that you can handle. Just kind of see one or two things, and let those guys take you to where the ball is supposed to be.” -Bo Nix From what I'm gathering regarding Bryce, the Panthers entered this season with a reset mindset. It's Young's rookie year, which explains the benching. Now, we're beginning to see the development of Canales and Young's offense. Slow development but we're winning 😃 
    • Bix has more tds through his first 11 games than bryce has his entire career....no comparison at all he made amazing throws during his first games his decision making just keeps getting better.  Young does not have the physical ability ro make the rhrows bo makes
×
×
  • Create New...