Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Patriots Joint Practice Day 1


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

Yeah I still find it odd he had that spaz anti Baker thing in the early off season a one truck pony deep threat WR should love a QB whose one big trick is chucking it deep.

i am honestly starting to think that RA just isnt socially aware, and didnt understand how the tweet would be received. The other piece is that he could have been trolling. Regardless, he has done a good job moving on from the tweet. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

right. which going back to my original comment about investing into coachspeak is a waste of time. Bc last week he said the opposite, this week its what we have wanted as fans.

This is the kind of thing that you put aside when a coach has earned your trust.

Matt Rhule has not earned my trust.

You may feel differently.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

This is the kind of thing that you put aside when a coach has earned your trust.

Matt Rhule has not earned my trust.

You may feel differently.

I just dont invest into it. Rhule has constantly said this kind of stuff and gone a different direction. Why waste energy on it when we dont have any insight on the convos outside of what the media gets?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

I just dont invest into it. Rhule has constantly said this kind of stuff and gone a different direction. Why waste energy on it when we dont have any insight on the convos outside of what the media gets?

Largely because the coach is a dumbass.

  • Flames 3
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

i am honestly starting to think that RA just isnt socially aware, and didnt understand how the tweet would be received. The other piece is that he could have been trolling. Regardless, he has done a good job moving on from the tweet. 

It’s one thing to talk poo online, but most people are likable in person. 

Always reserve judgement until you meet people yourself. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nah I wanna see these NFL evaluators talking about his prospects at WR aren't good because I would LOVE to see thier explanations 
    • You do realize that raw stats don't make someone a better or worse player, right? To begin with, the last time I checked, 1,319 is more yards than 1,258, so T-Mac had more yards (but I'll forgive you as a typo there and say you meant catches lol), but that's before even factoring in that Hunter did his in 13 games vs 12 for T-Mac because Arizona didn't make a bowl game. It's also completely ignoring the team around each player.  If you think Hunter having the 8th place finisher in the Heisman voting at QB isn't going to result in helping his top WRs stats, then you're sticking your head in the sand to purposefully not see it. Hunter's QB had 353 completions for 4,134 yards and 37 TDs vs T-Mac's QB who had 260 completions for 2,958 yards and 18 TDs. But sure, let's rank NFL prospects by their stats and say the guy with more catches and TDs is the better prospect.  So on that note, I now change my mind, T-Mac is no longer the best WR in the draft, it's Nick Nash who had 104 rec, 1,382 yards, and 16 TDs, all numbers better than Hunter's... because that's how this is done, right? As I've said before, if someone wants to like a player better than someone else that's totally fair, but come with real reasons, talk about their play, but to talk about things like stats as your reasoning, when you ignore the obvious and massive flaws in using those stats in that way, just makes you look dumb.
    • Nah you don't go out and put up the numbers he did without being able to run routes dude is a football junky so he works on his craft he isn’t THAT much more athletic than other players to just be able to go out and do whatever and succeed at that level 
×
×
  • Create New...