Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Player snap counts vs Commanders


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I think what really chaps my ass is, though we are fans, we still see obvious flaws in their games.  It isn't that we dislike them because we just don't want to like them.  They cannot be effective starters.  Worse than that is we actually have players that aren't just marginally better but leaps and bounds better.  Younger, Stronger and more versatile.   

Outside of having his ego ruined.  Rhule can't be this blind, than again he is. 

 

But the question is not whether they have flaws, but can we get/afford anyone that is better.  

Edited by Davidson Deac II
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WUnderhill said:

Either they thought the game and the reps were so meaningless and unimportant that they might as well give PJ Walker the most snaps at QB, or the possibility of Rhule trying to send Corral to the PS is more real than it should be. It’s one or the other.

This fan base is going to need to prepare itself for Corral to get cut, then light it up somewhere else later this season. P.J. Walker will play most of the next two games, because he's Rhule's favorite player and whether he does better or worse doesn't matter. He could go 0-16 for 0 yards and 7 INTs, and he's still not getting cut. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

This fan base is going to need to prepare itself for Corral to get cut, then light it up somewhere else later this season. P.J. Walker will play most of the next two games, because he's Rhule's favorite player and whether he does better or worse doesn't matter. He could go 0-16 for 0 yards and 7 INTs, and he's still not getting cut. 

I really wish Fitt had control over who to cut and McAdoo had control over who starts on offense. Limit Rhule to mismanaging time outs and it would be palatable 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I think what really chaps my ass is, though we are fans, we still see obvious flaws in their games.  It isn't that we dislike them because we just don't want to like them.  They cannot be effective starters.  Worse than that is we actually have players that aren't just marginally better but leaps and bounds better.  Younger, Stronger and more versatile.   

Outside of having his ego ruined.  Rhule can't be this blind, than again he is. 

 

There are numerous examples of how bad Rhule is at his job. Will Grier destroyed PJ Walker last preseason, but was cut because he didn't play for Temple. Now, Grier has the inside line on Dallas' backup QB job and has gotten rave reviews from coaches and media throughout camp.

Corral will meet the same fate in 3 weeks, when the headlines entering Week 1 are about how the hapless Panthers traded up for a QB they didn't let practice in camp, who barely got any preseason run, and who got cut so the Temple-Baylor Job Bank could stay in business. 

Ekwonu, on another team, is starting preseason week 1. Here, he's gonna be a healthy scratch at least 10 weeks out of the year. Matt Rhule has had a hand in 3 drafts now, and out of about 25 picks he's made one (1) good one: Jeremy Chinn. 

Man makes Hue Jackson look like Bill Belichick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You're not understanding what I'm saying. I'm saying that truly elite players will always have a market because they're elite difference makers and that at the "devalued positions" the NFL has discovered that those are spots where unless you have an elite talent there you have an opportunity to get similar results out of run of the mill talent for run of the mill money compared to good talent for good money. The drop off in overall unit performance isn't dramatic dropping down from "good" to "JAG" and it saves money to invest in the premium positions. It's about skill sets and what is hardest to find, simple supply and demand. There's just more serviceable LBs and RBs and safeties out there than their are CBs and pass rushers and QBs. And honestly, a big part of our historic lack of consistent success has been investing too many premium draft and cap resources into those devalued positions. Yeah, we've had a lot of great off the ball LBs and RBs on our way to be a franchise with an overall losing record. Pointing to our success at those positions is proving my point because I just point to our W-L record and overall lack of historical quality at premium positions like QB, WR, CB, etc. We've sucked in large part because we've valued the wrong position groups. In a vacuum it doesn't matter. But in actuality every high pick or big chunk of cap you spend on an off the ball LB or RB or IOL is a high pick or big chunk of cap you couldn't spend on a QB or CB or WR or OT.
    • Right before Kuechly retired, we had some of the worst D line play that year.  We were ranked 29th against the run in 2019.   I remember even Kuechly struggled to get off the blocks at times because the linemen were on second level so quickly due to our porous line made up of Kyle Love, Vernon Butler and a washed up Gerald McCoy.   
    • fingers crossed for BlueSky embeds to come with the board update at least all the schedule reveals will be on the youtube  
×
×
  • Create New...