Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule on practice reps


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, panthers55 said:

Corral was insurance in case we didn't get Baker and it was leverage to get a better price on Baker since drafting Corral meant we didn't need to trade for one.  When we got Baker that changed the urgency with Corral and made PJ totally expendable. He is only here to share reps in camp while Corral gets things down. From what Baker said this offense is complicated. Why is it hard to believe that Corral is struggling absorbing everything that even Baker said was tough.

 

Where else was Baker going to go? Let’s not pretend like Seattle, they obviously aren’t interested in adding a QB.

The whole leverage thing was BS coming from the media. Mayfield and the Browns relationship was fractured and the Browns were trying to sell him to us, we said no until the Browns had no choice but to give him away for free.

Additionally, how does Corral get up to speed with three reps a day in TC… I’m tired of repeating myself but I regress… Head ball coach Matt Rhule says you only get better with reps.

You’re acting like Corral is some sort of mental midget, there’s no reason for four QB’s to be on this roster. I wish Walker and Darnold nothing but the absolute best but this is a damn circus. I hope they go on to have great careers elsewhere but this is Mayfields team and when they aren’t pouring into him they need to be pouring into Corral.

If Mayfield goes down then we are fuged anyway and if by that point Corral still isn’t ready then call up one of the 30 other QB’s that are about to be out of a job in a couple of weeks.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, panthers55 said:

You assume people are holding Corral back. What if he were having difficulty getting our complicated offense down.  Baker said it was different from what he has seen before and was more complicated.  Maybe he needs mostly mental reps. I really don't know but no one is going to say he is struggling.

Maybe he needs actual reps because he doesn't learn as well by reading it. I can read something 20 times and not understand, then put my hands on it once and never forget it. Not everyone learns the same way. 

But we've all learned that Sam is not a starter and PJ isn't a capable backup. The only one who hasn't learned this is Rhay-Z.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

You assume people are holding Corral back. 

You talking about the same folks that have Elflein over Bozeman? Or the guy who ranted all last season about Brady not having the tools to play LT and now putting him over Icky?  Or the guy who thought Teddy wouldn’t be a checkdown champion here or that Sam was worth making the biggest cap hit on our entire roster this year? 

yeah, people are assuming Matt Rhule doesn’t have the best eye for things or plan.  Vegas assumes that too.  

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Obviously no one knows for sure what Tepper said but we know the official line of him supporting Rhule belied the narrative he was upset and embarrassed by his mistake in hiring Rhule and the poor results. The narrative has been that football guys came in who have head coach experience to fix the football side. Guys who have strong egos and lots of experience. Why bring them in and micromanage them. If you were McAdoo would you be OC if you couldn't design and run the offense. And Rhule would be a fool to try and overrule McAdoo especially when you have failed on your own the first 2 years.

 

Why did he bring them in? He was told he bring in an offensive Rockstar or he was fired. This wasn't a choice for Rhule, this was a demand. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only way this is excusable is if it gets rectified after the game tape is viewed.

I kind of understand making people earn it, but it goes both ways. Elfline, Jordan, and Darnold earned demotions yesterday.

If you believe in the hierarchy and accountability, show them the tape, why the lost their spots and adjust the depth chart accordingly. Now is the time to do it. The competition charade should be a formality that ends quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

@panthers55

 

1. Is MC a bigger project then Malik Willis?

 

2. Can you provide an example of a qb that has been developed this way?

 

kthanks

I watched part of that game.  Willis was trying to do everything with his legs.  The difference between Willis and Corral.  Willis is getting valuable Reps with the offense.  

Corral gets the last 5 minutes of practice because Rhule doesn't have anything else to work on.  As previously stated Rhule is treating Corral like he is redshirt freshman instead of the future of the franchise.

What is going to bite Rhule in the ass is when Darnold and Mayfield go down with injuries and we are forced to play Corral or someone off the streets.

If they do the former Corral will be ruined.  Corral will not be able to execute the offense from reading the playbook only.  HE HAS TO HAVE MEANINGFUL, VALUABLE REPS in practice. 

Edited by DaveThePanther2008
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Khaki Lackey said:

The only way this is excusable is if it gets rectified after the game tape is viewed.

I kind of understand making people earn it, but it goes both ways. Elfline, Jordan, and Darnold earned demotions yesterday.

If you believe in the hierarchy and accountability, show them the tape, why the lost their spots and adjust the depth chart accordingly. Now is the time to do it. The competition charade should be a formality that ends quickly.

Lol what dis did Darnold so on Film yesterday to lose his spot?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

yeah I didnt think you would answer

Why would I. Who says I would do things like McAdoo is doing or even agree. I can tell you the rationale without agreeing. Honestly we won't know if it is the best idea until things play out. I just wait to bitch until there is actually a reason. Unlike you who always has an opinion informed or not.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Lol what dis did Darnold so on Film yesterday to lose his spot?

I mean what has Sam Darnold in a competition with Baker Mayfield to begin with is the question. 

him having a spot as “co starter” is absurd to begin with.  A 19 yard preseason drive certainly doesn’t make this nonsense more legit.  Baker is simply a better QB than Sam.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As I said less than 10 minutes into the game, Boston looks nothing like we're used to seeing. Regardless, any curb-stomping of the Bruins is welcome.  The scorers all got the glory tonight, but all 6 D-men had excellent games. Across the board- Gost, Orlov, Chatty, Walker and, of course, Slavin & Burns.
    • I just tried a few mock draft simulators and this is the only way lol. Nothing else makes sense. 
    • No, biggest weakness is pass rush, but I don't think there is a blue chip can't miss DE prospect to take at #1 this year, same as with QB.  But beyond that, moving forward, yea WR is a pretty damn big weakness. We have 1 game this season over 224 yards passing and just traded away our best WR (who wasn't going to re-sign here anyways).  That WR no longer on the team was also the only player we've had this year who had over 78 yards receiving in a game.  So again, yea, WR is one of our biggest weaknesses even right now, let alone moving into the future. As I just said in my other post, I love Legette, but he's not going to be a Top 5-10 WR type of guy, Top 15-20 I can see, I think he can be a good #1 WR or an elite #2. After that, what do we have for the future?  Thielen isn't part of it, sure as hell isn't going to be Mingo, and as much as we all like Coker, in no world is Coker as our #2 to Legette as the #1 going be considered as "having weapons" at WR, even with Brooks and Sanders. But put someone like T-Mac into that group, who I genuinely think is going to be a Top 5 WR in this league for a long time, and it changes things.  A Top 5 WR with Legette/Coker as the 2/3, along with Brooks and Sanders, has the potential to be one of the best set of offensive weapons in the league if they reach their potential.  
×
×
  • Create New...