Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Corrall

NAS

By NAS,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Generally speaking, a fourth quarterback is a camp body that you only have in camp to spread the load around so that the first few you're actually concentrating on don't get tired.

Only NFL team that drafted a QB carrying 4 is Pitt.   And they drafted 2.  

Sam, Baker and Matt are all young.  Given Corral is developmental, I don’t think there is a worry about overusing his arm at the 3rd spot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Diehardpanth02 Community Regular

Diehardpanth02

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, MHS831 said:

Corral was not ready to play---this is what happens.  And yes, a bad OL and unfamiliar WRs/TEs can make you look terrible.   We were not getting a lot of pressure on Howell, and he probably gets more reps in practice--which explains the difference.

 

Not being ready to play is not indicative of the personnel surrounding him. The only execuse is lack of reps. The OL being bad doesn't help the situation. But at the same time Good QBs make plays no matter the situation they are in. They don't panic. They just find ways to make it happen.

Out of any position on the field that execuses can be made for, QB is not one of them. That is the leader of the offense..spot light is on you. You stink it up. You take the blame regardless if the guy dropped a pass or missed a block. And that's the way Corrall sees it, and that's the way we should see it. 

 

But Rhule needs to get his head out of his ass. BC splitting Reps with 4QBs is going to come back and bite him. Now is the time to make a cut. And if you cut your 3rd round pick for PJ(although PJ is not bad, and I actually think he's done well enough to find a place in this league) you look even more of fool. I'm not liking this head coach. He consistently makes bad decisions himself.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

It’s pretty well stated he wasn’t going to be ready this year. He has all year to figure it out (it’s why we traded for Baker). We just need to ditch Sam or PJ. It’s hard to manage/develop 4 QBs…

Does he?

What if we get hit with injuries?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Matthias Proficient

Matthias

Posted
Posted (edited)

Man, y'all need to stop hyping cats up just because you want a good QB.  I don't want to hear nothing about playing with offensive line guys who aren't going to be on an NFL roster.  He was playing against defensive scrubs as well.  The truth is, Corral right now sucks, and it will probably take years before he looks like a decent QB, if ever.  Thankfully, we don't have to fool around with such time tables.  If Mayfield has a good year, he will be our QB going forward.  If he sucks and the team sucks, we draft a real QB next year.  That was always the plan in my mind.

Edited by Matthias
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthercougar68 Grand Master

Panthercougar68

Posted
Posted
46 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

He's treating Corral more like a college freshman than a rookie NFL player, while at the same time seeming to act as if he's got all the time me in the world to develop him.

My biggest beef is still that reps which have been devoted to an unnecessary "competition" and to a quarterback we're not going to keep could have been used to help Corral adjust and learn.

 

I get the frustration with the rep scheme, I think Rhule is trying to outsmart himself with building trade value for players. I honestly could see him having the ego to get PJ traded somewhere to be the backup 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
Just now, Panthercougar68 said:

I get the frustration with the rep scheme, I think Rhule is trying to outsmart himself with building trade value for players. I honestly could see him having the ego to get PJ traded somewhere to be the backup 

If Rhule is doing all of this for trade value for PJ and/or sam then he is dumber then I initially thought.   Nobody is trading for either player, it just isnt going to happen.   Its almost like he has never paid attention to the NFL before he came here.   I cannot wait for tepper to can his ass and we get a legit NFL offensive mind who knows how to develop players

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RenoCarolina Proficient

RenoCarolina

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Fan01 said:

Run that tape back and watch LT, #67 Wyatt Miller.  The DE was past him on every snap before he even came out of his stance.  

Rhule playing Walker over Corral is just another joke on us in a long list.

They are playing Walker so he can get tape and get picked up. Treating a good soldier right keeps locker room tight. Corral is not going anywhere.  Including PS

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • LinvilleGorge
      2024 College Football Thread

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...