Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Defensive line


Stuart Smith
 Share

Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, Shocker said:

I am hoping for a big year from Nixon and honestly I am not very concerned with the DL or defense as a whole.  

Nixon showed great flashes before he got hurt. I'm not worried bc I think there is still a great chance we will add another DE and/or DT at some point. Coaches want to get a good look at the young guys during TC before making a move. It could be as late as after Week 1 before a move is made too bc then the team is not on the hook for a whole seasons salary if it doesn't pan out.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Seltzer said:

Nixon showed great flashes before he got hurt. I'm not worried bc I think there is still a great chance we will add another DE and/or DT at some point. Coaches want to get a good look at the young guys during TC before making a move. It could be as late as after Week 1 before a move is made too bc then the team is not on the hook for a whole seasons salary if it doesn't pan out.

This is too much positivity for the huddle. Tone it down.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, panthers55 said:

Not sure we can say much about the line until we start playing. There are many defensive ends who.played the run well and aren't any bigger than our guys. Strahan- 250,  TJ Watt - 251, Khalil Mack. - 247  Jason Taylor - 245.

Aaron Donald is listed anywhere between 260 and 280 at defensive tackle.  The majority weigh around 300. Even Suh as a nose tackle is only 313.  Now look at our players. We are just as big and strong. It is scheme and technique that make the difference not just size. Obvious talent too. But to say our front seven are small just isn't supported by the numbers. Our scheme was poor last year. When we would play Dallas and we had a big oline and good runners they would play 5 linemen with their hand in the dirt and go wide 9 to.push everything inside. How many times did we do that last year unless we were blitzing. None. We have the players let's see if we have the coaching.

 

The coaching piece/schemes/game planning is where I suspect the problem lies, and started suspecting that after the Dallas game last year. 

The players are a bit of an unknown, unfortunately.  I THINK we have the talent, and that talent was simply not put in the best position to shine.  Last year did not prove our young talent is what we thought it was.  If anything, it cast doubt.  We should have more "givens" and fewer "question marks" right now.

The alternative is we collectively stagnated/regressed in a number of areas.  That is possible, too, given the youth of our talent.  If this is the case, this year is critical for that talent to either step up or be pushed out.

Like you, my strong suspicion is the problem lies in our game planning/schemes.  We have some new faces that can lend some NFL experience to this, now we need to see if it works. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, poundaway said:

We were 8th in rushing yards allowed per attempt at 4.1 yards.  The whole league sucks at stopping the run.

We faced the 2nd most defensive drives and yet saw 2nd fewest pass attempts on our D.  I believe that played a role in our low TO count as well.

Ioannidis for Jones appears to be a wash. 
Wilson should be better than Carter against the run, and  
Matos should be better than Fox against the run and in pass rush. 
Luvu was good last year against the run, but he can't pass rush anything like Reddick.

Pasqualoni has a lot more experience in the NFL coaching lineman than Okam (from Baylor). 

In general, I think teams are going to pass more if we don't do something to replace Reddick.

I do agree, that the Browns are going to run and run in game 1 tho.

Only four teams last season gave up less than 100 a game on the ground.... and they were all even worse agaist the pass....

 

The entire nfl is geared to stop the pass not the run.... 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...