Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Friday Camp Updates 7/29


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, cookinbrak said:

To those who poop on Sam- you can't sell something if you don't use it occassionally.

That ship sailed. No one wants Sam. Literally no one. Their only hope is for a team to get desperate after an injury. 

That doesn’t warrant pissing away all these reps on him

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

I can’t understand why in the actual f*ck Matt Rhule is allowing Darnold to waste valuable reps with the 1’s. 

Baker needs all the reps he can get to build chemistry with this group. And spoiler alert (apparently) there is no QB competition so he’s literally just wasting reps

And to a lesser degree the same goes for PJ and Corral. Darnold and Corral should be splitting the leftover reps after Baker

Would be much more interested in seeing Corrall with the #1s instead of Sammy. If they are intent on keeping up the "competition" talk, right there would be the best test.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Would be much more interested in seeing Corrall with the #1s instead of Sammy. If they are intent on keeping up the "competition" talk, right there would be the best test.

Baker will wipe the floor with Corral but I agree he should be getting the reps over Darnold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...