Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Not buying the "good to great" characterization, but it's a plan


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

He's going into Year 3 of a 7 year contract. This was a tear down and rebuild. What happened last year was expected by everyone except blind Panthers fans.

That’s why he fired his OC and starting from scratch with new play book?

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CPcavedweller said:

He's going into Year 3 of a 7 year contract. This was a tear down and rebuild. What happened last year was expected by everyone except blind Panthers fans.

Yeeeeahh...no.

Matt Rhule's history suggested to everyone that he'd get a little better in the second year, even better in the third year, and so on.

One of the guys who was said to be expecting that second year Improvement was David Tepper. And per reports, he wound up embarrassed and disappointed by last year's results.

Truth be told though, Rhule's resume' doesn't actually predict a championship timeline because well...he's never won one.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The whole point of training camp and off-season is to get fans excited and get their hopes up so comes first game of the season each team fans will think they have a shot at the Super Bowl.  NFL actually does study and uses technique to get into fans head because they tend to spend a lot of money during that window on merchandise.  Some fans see thru this bullshit while others eat it up and beg for more.  Then they go into meltdown after 5th games of the season when reality sets in.  Then the following season they get manipulated again… and again.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Tbe said:

By other measures we had one of the worst Ds last year.

People say that, but is it true? We were ranked in the low 20s for rushing and passing from what I found. 

I began checking different stats (like 3rd down efficiency), and I was surprised quite frankly. I mean sure, we could have more INTs (we were like 6th from the bottom). And Red zone efficiency (TDs only) was near the bottom (29th), but you can't look at all of this stuff in a vacuum.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Rhule is referring to average defensive starting position, he is wrong to say its the worst in 5 years.  The Bears were worse in 2019.  

The RZ stat, is a little arbitrary.   A TD scored on a play from the 21 is worth the same a TD scored from the 19.  We were the same as the Packers and better than Vegas in that stat, near the bottom of the league.

More importantly, we allowed a TD on 23% of all drives against us, which puts us at 12th in the league. 

We improved from 2020 but there's plenty of room for more improvement.

 

Edited by poundaway
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Ja Rhule said:

For Tepper lovers

https://www.menshealth.com/health/a29214773/sports-fan-brain-science/

The free agency, the draft and training camp full of positive news all give you that dopamine hit and makes you feel soooo good.  Use common sense.

How do the chemicals work when you get angry every time Tepper or Rhule say something or do something you disagree with?  Asking for a friend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ja Rhule said:

Google it, lazy ass

Anger's Allure: Are You Addicted to Anger?
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/culture-shrink/201508/angers-allure-are-you-addicted-anger

1. Human neurobiology rewards anger.
2. Anger is similar to other addictions.
3. Anger boosts ego fragility.
4. Anger may be familiar/comfortable and also a method of emotional avoidance.

#3 explains a lot.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Ja Rhule said:

That’s why he fired his OC and starting from scratch with new play book?

It's easy enough to find out if someone doesn't have what it takes. So it wasn't about getting better or not getting better this past year, it was about Joe Brady not having enough experience for the next three years. So cut bait now and grow the program with someone else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

It's easy enough to find out if someone doesn't have what it takes. So it wasn't about getting better or not getting better this past year, it was about Joe Brady not having enough experience for the next three years. So cut bait now and grow the program with someone else. 

Oh, I agree wholeheartedly with this idea 😁

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...