Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Free Agency Garage Sale


shaq
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, shaq said:

Not sure if Washington lets him walk but I’d be all over Daron Payne if he hit free agency.

They 100% are. Paid Allen and cant afford to pay two DTs. Teams have already started reaching out for a trade. Would be an amazing fit next to Burns and D. Brown. 

Edited by Jared Patterson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/16/2022 at 11:33 PM, 4Corners said:

Unfortunately the panthers do not have a mature enough fanbase to handle a Nassib signing 

That's mighty accusatory and an overall assumption of an entire population you know nothing of unless you have interviewed us all other than your broad statement isn't it? I guess every single other fan would have a problem then except you and I? If you think so poorly of the fanbase as a whole, why don't you just root for another team then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

Jeff king and Gary Barnidge 

 

both while panthers combined for less than 400 yards receiving combined each year together and in 2008 they had less than 200 yards receiving combined.

Both of them would start right now for the Panthers - and I can at least remember some flashes from Gary which is more than I can say for any of the scrubs we got now 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/17/2022 at 12:47 PM, Jared Patterson said:

None. Save the money for Dayron Payne next year....

Last two months been meaning to start a Payne thread, I hope Finesserererere has gave old herniay a call.... He fills the want and need while being very good. I know the funds are tight next year already (plus no QB too).....feels like pipedream given the cap. Hes going to demand around 15-20 and that feels impossible to fit here. 

2023 draft needs to be 90% DL with using early picks too. Even with resigning Burns and whatever Dbrown does, its a shell of the glory days. 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...