Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Baker's #?


GOAT
 Share

Recommended Posts

Sorry guys, but you can't go retiring every number that belonged to a player you liked.

This is one case where I actually agree with Tepper. With all the Hall of Famers in their history, the Steelers could retire a load of numbers, but they don't.

Retiring Sam Mills number made sense because Mills was more than just a good player.

Newton? Kuechly? Smith? I can see equipment managers holding them back for a few years, but retiring them? Nah.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

Im aware, I called that out earlier in the thread. Im sure PJ will accept some cash for the number based on his current career trajectory. 

Our buddy Ellis points out that the number 13 represents a "baker's dozen".

Hadn't thought about that but... 🤔

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Sorry guys, but you can't go retiring every number that belonged to a player you liked.

This is one case where I actually agree with Tepper. With all the Hall of Famers in their history, the Steelers could retire a load of numbers, but they don't.

Retiring Sam Mills number made sense because Mills was more than just a good player.

Newton? Kuechly? Smith? I can see equipment managers holding them back for a few years, but retiring them? Nah.

You can always let players wear famous numbers (Yankees have done it numerous times) then eventually retire that number and for the player it's meant to be tied to. Not saying anyone will or should wear #1, but it could easily be worn by someone else, then after they part ways you can retire it "for Cam".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • For the silly people that worship her it will be that.  The Coleman 'legend' thing, they did that with another fairly average player that was here and I sort of mocked or questioned the 'legend' status. Instantly caught crap for insulting someone's favorite Panther. So okay, Kurt Coleman is a Legend. 
    • You allow him to compete--you all are talking as if I am proposing making him the starter. Give him a new coach, new weapons, good OL, etc. and see what happens. You are saying, "Well Damn.  It did not work for 3 guys..."  Right now, our C is injured, we lost our top 2 WRs.  Better question:  If you need a QB, Why would you not take a chance on bringing in a QB who was a former first rounder, a good arm, intelligence, mobility, youth, etc.  and see how he does out of NY--with a better OL, better running game, better receivers.  I am not saying give him a 10-year contract, I am saying give him a chance. You act like there is no improvement on offense here--it was a 2 year process, and next year is year 2.  To me, how can you sit there with Bryce and an opportunity to sign a veteran QB on the cheap comes available and you say--"Not us. We're good.  We are waiting for Patrick Mahommes."  Jone's problem is obviously mental--and he has little support.  Why is this so frigging hard to comprehend.  It is called "bottom fishing" and it is better than sitting in the boat.  
    • I think we're going to fall from behind quite early and be forced to abandon the run game.  3 rushes -2 yards 1 catch -10 yards 
×
×
  • Create New...