Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2022 Panthers

shaq

By shaq,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, 4Corners said:

3 wins maximum 

I say 4 maybe 5.

They start off with a couple wins then lose but try to keep darn old and probably Mayfield in there and keep on losing then they put corrall in there at the end and win a few more.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
shaq Mentor

shaq

Posted
  • Author
Posted
4 hours ago, 4Corners said:

3 wins maximum 

Personally I see 8 winnable games next year, maybe I have my rose tinted glasses on but I’m really optimistic about our improvement on the o-line. Saints are overrated this year, Falcons are legit the worst team in the league. I think we’re going to have a better record then last year that is my hot take.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
4Corners Grand Master

4Corners

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, rayzor said:

I say 4 maybe 5.

They start off with a couple wins then lose but try to keep darn old and probably Mayfield in there and keep on losing then they put corrall in there at the end and win a few more.

If we get Mayfield I think it’s a totally different team and could win 8-9 games 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

If we get Mayfield I think it’s a totally different team and could win 8-9 games 

sorry. not a believer in mayfield. he might be good for one or two more wins than darnold, but not much more. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
4Corners Grand Master

4Corners

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, rayzor said:

sorry. not a believer in mayfield. he might be good for one or two more wins than darnold, but not much more. 

I’m telling u if we get mayfield we can compete. He was hurt all of last year. I don’t understand the mayfield hate he is a gamer 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, rayzor said:

pete campbell shrug GIF

just don't see him as an aggressive competitor. 

It's overhype due to desperation of staring down another year of Sam. Baker is better than Sam but not good. If he was his team would not have done what they did and rolled with him on his 5th year option.

Arrested Development Eye Roll GIF

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
shaq Mentor

shaq

Posted
  • Author
Posted
13 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

So Wilks is "Defensive passing game coordinator"? Does that give him a little more control over the actual play calls/Snow asking for some help from the guy with actual NFL experience?

One would hope, Wilks being back here is a big reason why I’m an optimist about our defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...