Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chelsea set to name ex-Man City, Carolina Panthers executive Tom Glick in top director role


Recommended Posts

Chelsea is fishy as hell.  Everyone quit Chelsea front office after Russian sugar daddy owner and close Putin friend got banned.  Chelsea was purchased by the American guy including investment company Clearlake Capital (private equity firm) that got an investment of $50 billion in 2020 out of the blue (they were worth $7.1B and company only 15 years old).  Clearlake Capital is funneling money back into Chelsea.  Some believe ex Chelsea and Putin closest friend Roman Abramovich set up shell company and indirectly owns Chelsea and uses American guy as face of the franchise.

Glick, who ran Manchester City that is owned by another sugar daddy aka Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan aka Royal princess of Abu Dhabi is known for using shell companies to funnel money into the club.  He helped develop a scheme where prince of Abu Dhabi owned all Manchester City sponsors and gave himself outrages contracts to bypass FairPlay rules (expenses cannot exceed revenue so he used sponsors to give the team insane contracts to make revenue look inflated).

That’s Glick to you ladies and gentleman. 

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/1/2022 at 6:25 PM, TheCasillas said:

Well that explains a lot. I will rescind my comment about Tepper being the reason Glick left when the event occurred. Just shows I have no idea wtf im talking about when it comes to behind close doors situations at BoA. 

Yeah but hell, none of us really do.  I say it’s the off-season and just let it fly.  
 

Reaction GIF by moodman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/1/2022 at 6:01 PM, Ja Rhule said:

Chelsea is fishy as hell.  Everyone quit Chelsea front office after Russian sugar daddy owner and close Putin friend got banned.  Chelsea was purchased by the American guy including investment company Clearlake Capital (private equity firm) that got an investment of $50 billion in 2020 out of the blue (they were worth $7.1B and company only 15 years old).  Clearlake Capital is funneling money back into Chelsea.  Some believe ex Chelsea and Putin closest friend Roman Abramovich set up shell company and indirectly owns Chelsea and uses American guy as face of the franchise.

Glick, who ran Manchester City that is owned by another sugar daddy aka Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan aka Royal princess of Abu Dhabi is known for using shell companies to funnel money into the club.  He helped develop a scheme where prince of Abu Dhabi owned all Manchester City sponsors and gave himself outrages contracts to bypass FairPlay rules (expenses cannot exceed revenue so he used sponsors to give the team insane contracts to make revenue look inflated).

That’s Glick to you ladies and gentleman. 

Sir, that's a conspiracy and I've been told on here, conspiracies are only correct 5% of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/1/2022 at 6:01 PM, Ja Rhule said:

Chelsea is fishy as hell.  Everyone quit Chelsea front office after Russian sugar daddy owner and close Putin friend got banned.  Chelsea was purchased by the American guy including investment company Clearlake Capital (private equity firm) that got an investment of $50 billion in 2020 out of the blue (they were worth $7.1B and company only 15 years old).  Clearlake Capital is funneling money back into Chelsea.  Some believe ex Chelsea and Putin closest friend Roman Abramovich set up shell company and indirectly owns Chelsea and uses American guy as face of the franchise.

Glick, who ran Manchester City that is owned by another sugar daddy aka Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan aka Royal princess of Abu Dhabi is known for using shell companies to funnel money into the club.  He helped develop a scheme where prince of Abu Dhabi owned all Manchester City sponsors and gave himself outrages contracts to bypass FairPlay rules (expenses cannot exceed revenue so he used sponsors to give the team insane contracts to make revenue look inflated).

That’s Glick to you ladies and gentleman. 

Salty Arsenal supporter.  In truth you could be right but Chelsea are better off with the new owners
 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...