Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Another Mayfield Trade Thread... How about a 3 Way?


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Raleigh PF said:

While I'm a proponent of a good three-way, but this is awful.

How about everyone keeps the money where it is and the players simply trade teams - Darnold to SF, Garoppolo to the Browns and Baker to the Panthers. The money is already on the books anyhow.

Not a bad idea if they would try it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Riverboat Ron said:

I brought a 3 way scenario up with my wife when her friend was over the other day, now I’m sleeping in the dog house with a busted nose. Why is everyone so against 3 way trades?

Cause Carolina is not the only one getting screwed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Riverboat Ron said:

I brought a 3 way scenario up with my wife when her friend was over the other day, now I’m sleeping in the dog house with a busted nose. Why is everyone so against 3 way trades?

I am sure the extra guy would have just ruined your self esteem…she did you a favor 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/29/2022 at 12:27 PM, DaveThePanther2008 said:

A 3-Team Baker Mayfield Quarterback Trade Is Being Floated (msn.com)

I swear writers come up with the dumbest ideas.  I don't think this has been put on the table but Carolina gets screwed in it.

We get Mayfield, Cleveland gets Jimmy G and we cough up 2 picks...

NOT NO BUT HELL NO. 

How about we take Mayfield and his cap hit, Cleveland takes Jimmy G, and SF takes Darnold and his cap hit.  Only threeway trade I would agree with.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

How about we take Mayfield and his cap hit, Cleveland takes Jimmy G, and SF takes Darnold and his cap hit.  Only threeway trade I would agree with.  

I'd go for that but I don't see Cleveland taking all of Jimmy G's contract. They'd be better off taking the all but 5 million for Mayfield. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I'd go for that but I don't see Cleveland taking all of Jimmy G's contract. They'd be better off taking the all but 5 million for Mayfield. 

I certainly don't think it would happen.  I just don't like any other option.  

I think there is a possibility our coaching staff wants it.  Rhule is probably a little on the desperate side, and under some pressure to show improvement this year.  And getting even an average qb would help, whether its Mayfield or Jimmy G.  But I don't think should give up much to get said qb.

Not that the team listens to me.  🙂

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nah I wanna see these NFL evaluators talking about his prospects at WR aren't good because I would LOVE to see thier explanations 
    • You do realize that raw stats don't make someone a better or worse player, right? To begin with, the last time I checked, 1,319 is more yards than 1,258, so T-Mac had more yards (but I'll forgive you as a typo there and say you meant catches lol), but that's before even factoring in that Hunter did his in 13 games vs 12 for T-Mac because Arizona didn't make a bowl game. It's also completely ignoring the team around each player.  If you think Hunter having the 8th place finisher in the Heisman voting at QB isn't going to result in helping his top WRs stats, then you're sticking your head in the sand to purposefully not see it. Hunter's QB had 353 completions for 4,134 yards and 37 TDs vs T-Mac's QB who had 260 completions for 2,958 yards and 18 TDs. But sure, let's rank NFL prospects by their stats and say the guy with more catches and TDs is the better prospect.  So on that note, I now change my mind, T-Mac is no longer the best WR in the draft, it's Nick Nash who had 104 rec, 1,382 yards, and 16 TDs, all numbers better than Hunter's... because that's how this is done, right? As I've said before, if someone wants to like a player better than someone else that's totally fair, but come with real reasons, talk about their play, but to talk about things like stats as your reasoning, when you ignore the obvious and massive flaws in using those stats in that way, just makes you look dumb.
    • Nah you don't go out and put up the numbers he did without being able to run routes dude is a football junky so he works on his craft he isn’t THAT much more athletic than other players to just be able to go out and do whatever and succeed at that level 
×
×
  • Create New...