Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ESPN's Dan Graziano: "the majority of the people to whom I spoke with believe Jimmy Garoppolo will likely end up being released" sign with Carolina Panthers

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

CashNewton22 Experienced

CashNewton22

Posted
Posted

IF he’s released I’m cool with it. He’s better than Sam, has been on teams that have made deep playoff runs and he’s not a douche. If corral still beats him out all the better but I have no problem with Jimmy G as long as it’s signed as a FA and the price tag is low.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, poundaway said:

You're not going to watch the games?

Like last season, watch while I read or play some games. It's just not going to be good enough to require my full attention and life is too short. I'll go watch a game live when Corral starts and I'll cheer 'fire Rhule' for fun. Good people around me that have watched a lot of bad football over the years so they are more fun than the games themselves in these kind of years. The rest I will give to family or sell to opposing fans as it has been since Tepper got here.

I'm a grown man, not a free cheerleader. This is a professional sport and not a highschool game. It's not that difficult. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldhamA Grand Master

OldhamA

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

I'd rather just see Corral for 17 games. 

No more Darnold.

I don't have an issue with a cheap Baker or Jimmy G but solely on a one year deal. If possible, completely forbidden from resigning/extending them until April 2023. 

I'd like to see Darnold behind an NFL OLine. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
poundaway Grand Master

poundaway

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Like last season, watch while I read or play some games. It's just not going to be good enough to require my full attention and life is too short. I'll go watch a game live when Corral starts and I'll cheer 'fire Rhule' for fun. Good people around me that have watched a lot of bad football over the years so they are more fun than the games themselves in these kind of years. The rest I will give to family or sell to opposing fans as it has been since Tepper got here.

I'm a grown man, not a free cheerleader. This is a professional sport and not a highschool game. It's not that difficult. 

Well I guess, you, your family and friends, we'll all be enjoying that turd meal, with or without sprinkles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bigdog10 Experienced

bigdog10

Posted
Posted

Jimmy G is a perfect qb to mentor Corrall for a year. The guy seems to always be on a winning team and has been around some of the best to ever do it. 
 

I wouldn’t expect him to come in here and set the world on fire but he is a definitive upgrade over Sam and a third round rookie. 
 

id expect us to be a fringe wildcard team if he were the starter, barring injuries or course. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted (edited)

I just don't believe this because the Panthers know a thing or two about a QB with a banged up shoulder and they also know a thing or two about a bad investment in a risky QB. If they do this we can officially put a hold on the Scott Fitterer praise that has been going around lately.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...