Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Baker Mayfield watch

ncfan

By ncfan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

SazmoRanger Proficient

SazmoRanger

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

He only got a good coach in year 3 and 4.  Hugh and Kitchen were there before that.  He couldn't hit OBJ (according to you) so where is all of this other talent that made him so great?  Landry who was a FA until like mid/late May this year?  Their TE??  Chubb was solid, but CMC is pretty good too right?  They had Garrett on defense and a decent CB in Ward.  I just don't think that Browns team was as "loaded" as everyone thinks.  They were solid, but we definitely have some pieces here as well.  Plus OBJ only played in like 7 games and Chubb missed time as well.    

I’m not here to say how good all those guys are, but how are they compared to our guys? I personally like OBJ more than Moore, but for argument sake, lets call them a wash. Landry is better than Anderson. Njoku is better than any TE we have on our roster. Sure, lets say McCaffrey is better than Chubb. Chubb is just a notch under McCaffrey but they also had Hunt who is 100x better than any backup RB we have. But most importantly, they had a top 5 offensive line. 
 

If any top 15 QB had that offense they’d be staring down a SB run. He had more to work with in Cleveland than 80% of NFL QBs have, including Carolina. 
 

If he can’t be the man with that roster, I don’t want him and neither should anybody else. Sure, he’s better than Darnold, but that’s like saying I’m better at running marathons than a paraplegic. 
 

Quit trading away assets and taking snaps away from other players. Roll with Darnold and let Corral learn at the backup position this year. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ricky Spanish Grand Master

Ricky Spanish

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

 

It's fun to look at the leverage that each team has in this situation:

Cleveland's leverage:

  • Baker is better than any QB currently on our roster.
  • Panthers have a HC on the hotseat and Baker is an upgrade at the most important position.
  • They have another potential suitor for Baker in Seattle.

Our Leverage:

  • Cleveland needs to clear cap space for the future and rolling any savings over would be beneficial for them.
  • They burned the bridge with Mayfield and he is never playing for them again.
  • If no one trades for Baker then Cleveland has to eat his entire salary while he doesn't play for them next season.
  • We just drafted a rookie QB with high upside that we like.
  • We have a QB who costs the exact same as Baker so there's no point paying two QBs the same amount of money and playing only one.
  • Mayfield is only under contract for one more year.
  • Mayfield is coming off a down year.
  • Mayfield is coming off of offseason surgery.
  • Due to the Watson deal, CLE is hurting for Draft capital.
  • Baker, while an upgrade, is enough of a question mark that you can't sell the farm for him.

I'm sure I'm missing some points for both sides but it looks like we have way more leverage in these negotiations on the surface.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Ricky Spanish said:

It's fun to look at the leverage that each team has in this situation:

Cleveland's leverage:

  • Baker is better than any QB currently on our roster.
  • Panthers have a HC on the hotseat and Baker is an upgrade at the most important position.
  • They have another potential suitor for Baker in Seattle.

Our Leverage:

  • Cleveland needs to clear cap space for the future and rolling any savings over would be beneficial for them.
  • We just drafted a rookie QB with high upside that we like.
  • We have a QB who costs the exact same as Baker so there's no point in making a trade for that money.
  • They burned the bridge with Mayfield and he is never playing for them again.
  • Mayfield is only under contract for one more year.
  • Mayfield is coming off a down year.
  • Mayfield is coming off of offseason surgery.
  • Due to the Watson deal, CLE is hurting for Draft capital.
  • Baker, while an upgrade, is enough of a question mark that you can't sell the farm for him.

I'm sure I'm missing some points for both sides but it looks like we have way more leverage in these negotiations on the surface.

Jonathan Jones says we've made Cleveland "the best offer".

Not sure I like the sound of that.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, SazmoRanger said:

I’m not here to say how good all those guys are, but how are they compared to our guys? I personally like OBJ more than Moore, but for argument sake, lets call them a wash. Landry is better than Anderson. Njoku is better than any TE we have on our roster. Sure, lets say McCaffrey is better than Chubb. Chubb is just a notch under McCaffrey but they also had Hunt who is 100x better than any backup RB we have. But most importantly, they had a top 5 offensive line. 
 

If any top 15 QB had that offense they’d be staring down a SB run. He had more to work with in Cleveland than 80% of NFL QBs have, including Carolina. 
 

If he can’t be the man with that roster, I don’t want him and neither should anybody else. Sure, he’s better than Darnold, but that’s like saying I’m better at running marathons than a paraplegic. 
 

Quit trading away assets and taking snaps away from other players. Roll with Darnold and let Corral learn at the backup position this year. 

OBJ was only there for 7 games in 2020 and Chubb missed several (2).  Njoku has talent but hands that are like Ginn (it also looks like he only started 5 games that year, Hooper was their 1).  Landry is a good slot but he isn't some elite WR.  The OL is definitely the difference.  He had a good OL with Landry as his number 1 for over half the season and Willis was a rookie at LT.  I'm not saying we will have a top 10 OL, but we have a top rookie LT also with a great RT and added some solid pieces in Bozeman and Corbett.  The 2020 Browns roster isn't light years ahead of ours IMO.

Here is a breakdown of that Brown's roster with games started and stats

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/cle/2020_roster.htm

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SazmoRanger Proficient

SazmoRanger

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

OBJ was only there for 7 games in 2020 and Chubb missed several (2).  Njoku has talent but hands that are like Ginn (it also looks like he only started 5 games that year, Hooper was their 1).  Landry is a good slot but he isn't some elite WR.  The OL is definitely the difference.  He had a good OL with Landry as his number 1 for over half the season and Willis was a rookie at LT.  I'm not saying we will have a top 10 OL, but we have a top rookie LT also with a great RT and added some solid pieces in Bozeman and Corbett.  The 2020 Browns roster isn't light years ahead of ours IMO.

Here is a breakdown of that Brown's roster with games started and stats

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/cle/2020_roster.htm

 

Chub missing 2 games is “several”? Why bring that up when we have a RB that has missed 23 games in 2 years? Hell, you made my point about TE. Hooper and Njoku is 1000x better than all of our TEs. My point is even if our roster is EQUAL to the 2020 Browns(it’s not), why do you think Baker can come in here and do something when he’s proven he can’t with an equal roster with better coaches? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

Unless Fitt thinks he could be the guy depending on how he plays. He also may give Corral time to develop while keeping the team competitive (yes I know you don’t like him sitting, but it’s not uncommon for coaches to do this). He could also help develop players like Marshall and Tremble by having a competent QB throwing them passes. There are some pros/cons to signing him. The main thing is don’t overpay him or give away much to acquire him.

Looking over the top 15 qbs in the draft and I see less then 5 that sat and then played to become all pros.  I see 2 (Cousins, Rodgers) that was "developed".  The development angle of qbs is simply a myth and if it was a thing you would see more teams doing it.  They simply dont.  Why didnt buffalo sit Allen, Cards Murray?  How about Carr? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

After all the posturing, if we end up paying more of Darnold's salary than Cleveland does Mayfield, ugh 😬

So I mid/late pick and Darnold??  If we both are paying the same amount of our QB's contract, why not just trade them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
Just now, ForJimmy said:

So I mid/late pick and Darnold??  If we both are paying the same amount of our QB's contract, why not just trade them?

Paying the same amount I could deal with.

Us paying more of Darnold's salary than Cleveland pays of Mayfield's though would feel like we lost the staring contest.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • LinvilleGorge
      2024 College Football Thread

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Well, we got our answer on Army today.
    • Davidson Deac II
      2024 College Football Thread

      By Davidson Deac II · Posted

      Not a chance the SEC could compete with the NFL.  In the large cities that are not in the Southeast, (LA, NYC, Chicago, SF) College football is an afterthought.  
×
×
  • Create New...