Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Report: Panthers staff not all on same page about acquiring Browns QB Baker Mayfield


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Per numerous credible reports he would've already been traded if the Browns were willing to take on more of his salary. They're just not yet willing to accept the market price. Hence why if I was Mayfield I'd ratchet up the noise to force my way out. I mean, the rest of the league already knows he's toxic.

 

So you want him to add fuel to the fire that is his reputation, by demanding even more money? Way to torpedo your future.

 

Face it. You made a silly comment. It happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

So you want him to add fuel to the fire that is his reputation, by demanding even more money? Way to torpedo your future.

 

Face it. You made a silly comment. It happens.

😂

Mayfield is a reclamation project. He's gotta get out of Cleveland to start that. As soon as he's out he can come out and ah shucks it up and simply say that he was doing what he had to do to get himself out of the "Mistake by the Lake".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

😂

Mayfield is a reclamation project. He's gotta get out of Cleveland to start that. As soon as he's out he can come out and ah shucks it up and simply say that he was doing what he had to do to get himself out of the "Mistake by the Lake".

 

You seem to think that demanding more money is his way out. 

 

I believe that it would not only not work, it would damage his already shaky reputation.

 

The longer the season goes on, with no movement for Baker. The better the odds are that some team may come up with an offer the Browns will take. But as of right now? The Browns are not moving off their stance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

 

It's a rookie deal, that money is guaranteed.

They could try to take it from him but it really wouldn't matter. Still counts against the cap. 

I also think the Browns have basically already moved on. I don't think they are interested in a malcontent QB torpedoing their season.

If he holds out, he loses the money and an accrued  season.  Similar to the Leveon Bell situation.  Baker is not going to hold out and lose all that money.  It’s only guaranteed if he reports.

now - he could pull a Jerome Bettis and fake an injury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Smithers said:

If he holds out, he loses the money and an accrued  season.  Similar to the Leveon Bell situation.  Baker is not going to hold out and lose all that money.  It’s only guaranteed if he reports.

now - he could pull a Jerome Bettis and fake an injury.

I suspect they would just go the Deshaun Watson route and pay him to stay home. Better for both of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

So you want him to add fuel to the fire that is his reputation, by demanding even more money? Way to torpedo your future.

 

Face it. You made a silly comment. It happens.

I mean, I understand what you're saying, but I think there are layers to this which everyone is aware of, and as such I don't necessarily buy into the opinion that he'd be torpedoing his future by playing hardball with the Browns. Sure, I don't think Mayfield is all that, but I do recognize that I could be wrong and that he has enough questions around his career that someone may still want to take a chance on him. That being said, if  someone really believes that Baker has untapped franchise-level talent---value, then he's going to get another shot, regardless of what goes on with the Browns.

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

3 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I mean, I understand what you're saying, but I think there are layers to this which everyone is aware of, and as such I don't necessarily buy into the opinion that he'd be torpedoing his future by playing hardball with the Browns. Sure, I don't think Mayfield is all that, but I do recognize that I could be wrong and that he has enough questions around his career that someone may still want to take a chance on him. That being said, if  someone really believes that Baker has untapped franchise-level talent---value, then he's going to get another shot, regardless of what goes on with the Browns.

 

There are a myriad of ways this can go. But Baker demanding more money? That ain't one of them.

Edited by iamhubby1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

 

There are a myriad of ways this can go. But Baker demanding more money? That ain't one of them.

I agree, but LG was just musing and licking his chops over imaginative possibilities. Mayfield demanding more money would make for a helluva soap opera. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I agree, but LG was just musing and licking his chops over imaginative possibilities. Mayfield demanding more money would make for a helluva soap opera. 

 

Ok then.

 

So the next time I get called out for saying something silly. I'll just say I was musing. No harm, no foul.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BrianS said:

No he doesn't.  The Browns have him by the balls.  He signed a contract, they guaranteed his salary this year.  If he holds out, he doesn't get the year credit, so he would have to play for the Browns in 2023 under that 18 million.

Now, the Browns could ask him to NOT report.  They would still be on the hook for his salary in that case, but Baker would get his year credit and the ability to go wherever he wants next offseason.  It also wouldn't preclude him being traded in the future . . . but that's another (*@# show waiting to happen.

It's just a completely toxic situation for all parties because it was handled incredibly poorly.

Unless the rules changed in the last CBA, as long as Baker reports by Week 10, he gets credit for an accrued season. By that point, the Browns season could already be in deep trouble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, philit99 said:

I think swapping Sam for Baker is the best for both sides. We get a one year rental and they get a starter while Watson is out, win/win or lose/lose depending on how you see it.

I can't see them taking on Darnold. If we actually think Corral is the future I'd stay away from Baker's toxicity. You can be toxic IF you're elite. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...