Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes Vs Rangers Game 7

Panthers Fan 69

By Panthers Fan 69,
in Carolina Hurricanes

 Share

Recommended Posts

KillerKat Grand Master

KillerKat

Posted
Posted

Instead of blaming every goal on Raanta, you should ask why do we keep letting guys get so close to him that he gets screened or someone else gets a free skate in there for a deflection. The Rangers are doing what we should be doing. Making a crowd in front of the net. I just saw Vinny actually get out of the way of a shot when he was already in the way of Igor's sight. It's like we are missing a lot of details out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Harbingers Grand Master

Harbingers

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

Agreed completely we aren't coming back two on shitsterkin... Raanta has doomed the canes.

I don’t blame Raanta. I blame the coach that didn’t give him a game off that we could afford. Whether it was Rod or the goalie coach. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Smithers Grand Master

Smithers

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

Instead of blaming every goal on Raanta, you should ask why do we keep letting guys get so close to him that he gets screened or someone else gets a free skate in there for a deflection. The Rangers are doing what we should be doing. Making a crowd in front of the net. I just saw Vinny actually get out of the way of a shot when he was already in the way of Igor's sight. It's like we are missing a lot of details out there.

Come on man - Raanta has been soft as hell.  He is not entirely to blame, but he has not been playing playoff hockey.  Heck not even starting caliber hockey.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
Posted
Just now, Snake said:

Welp were fuged. Second year in a row we have been just not good enough in the playoffs. Feeling panther vibes with this team. 

Need to go spend big money and get a top guy. When the team is down 0-2 in game 7 we all know the game is over because none of those guys are special and able to put together a game to carry the team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...