Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brady Christensen taking snaps at Center


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Are you sure you cannot come up with 1 or 2 legitimate reasons they are trying this?

You mean other than they still don't know where to put him?
They knew we needed a LT last year.  They drafted this guy.  They then proceed to put him at RT  behind Moton. 

WTF.
The thought process on the OL has been haphazard and random, at one point even trying Moton at LT.  It was a disaster. 

 

  • Beer 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, poundaway said:

You mean other than they still don't know where to put him?
They knew we needed a LT last year.  They drafted this guy.  They then proceed to put him at RT  behind Moton. 

WTF.
The thought process on the OL has been haphazard and random, at one point even trying Moton at LT.  It was a disaster. 

 

 

So...No, you cannot think of any legitimate reasons they are giving Brady reps at Center? I bet you never really put your heart into finding any reasons for giving Brady C reps?

 

It's OTAs, what better time to try these experiments? 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

So...No, you cannot think of any legitimate reasons they are giving Brady reps at Center? I bet you never really put your heart into finding any reasons for giving Brady C reps?

 

It's OTAs, what better time to try these experiments? 

 

 

They experimented with him at nearly every position last year.  Center is all that's left, unless they're putting him in the backfield.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, poundaway said:

They experimented with him at nearly every position last year.  Center is all that's left, unless they're putting him in the backfield.

 

Ok then, I'll play. One reason they may be giving him C snaps is because we only have 2 real Centers on the team. Finding out if Brady can play C makes sense.

 

Another reason could be they want to have extra bodies during the dog days of Training Camp. So finding out now whether he can give it a go, is smart.

 

Yet another reason could be that they don't plan on him starting this year. So the more he knows, the better we are.

 

This does not automatically mean they want Brady at C. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Swaggasaurus said:

Prefer him there over guard. You need a mean nasty sumbitch with a good size ass at those guard spots.

 

Our starting Oline very well could be; Icky, Mays, Bozeman, Corbet, Moton.

 

The more positions Brady can play. The better it make us as a team.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Maybe just looking for that emergency Center. There was a game last year where we had guys on the sidelines practicing their snaps. 

 

We only had 2 Centers last year. Maybe we are trying to hedge our bets so to speak?

 

Or maybe it's just OTAs, and they don't want any of our real Centers getting over worked?

Emergency that can possibly transition there full time is my guess as well.

C is an important position, from what I can tell, BC is a smart guy...those things pair up well.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't get the Hunter hate. Just imagine his ceiling if he stopped trying to be this 2way freak and focused on one side of the ball 
    • 100%.  You have to play the cards that are dealt.  Not the cards you wish were dealt.
    • I'd say its definitely going to be addressed this off-season.  We went into the last draft with a roster of RBs including:  Chubba, Blackshear, and Miles Sanders. We picked Jonathan Brooks in the second and still signed Rashaad Penny afterwards.  Fast forward....One turned into a top 10 back, 1 is injured/out for most if not all the '25 season, 1 retired, 1 will either take a huge paycut or be cut, and the last is a restricted free agent. We brought in Mike Boone as well. Add him to the free agent list also.  We need a physical option.    Which qualifies:  Ashton Jeanty(Boise St): Overall ranked Top 10. Almost 2k yards after contact, 28 tds. Would take our first rounder. My money would be on an NFC East team selecting him. (97.2 PFF run grade) - 121 forced missed tackles.  Omarion Hampton(UNC): Ranked everywhere from 20 - 59 overall. Consensus #2 back after Jeanty. He'll be a second rounder. 1,222 Yards after contact w/ 15 tds.  (90.5 PFF run grade) - 72 forced missed Tackles Kaleb Johnson(Iowa): Ranked from 38 - 69 depending on which media outlet you prefer but generally #3. 2nd/3rd possibly. 1,060 Yards after contact w/ 21 tds.(86.7 PFF run grade)- 66 forced missed tackles Cam Skattebo: Ranked from the 50's - 104. Every mock I do he ends up BPA at some point. 969 Yards after contact w/ 17 tds(92 PFF Run Grade). Probably the best receiving back of the group. 81 forced missed tackles.  If the '24 and '25 draft classes were combined, IMO the rankings would be, in order: Jeanty, Hampton, Brooks, Johnson, Skattebo. I wouldn't take one high but I'd take one for Chubba and Brooks insurance. 
×
×
  • Create New...