Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Giants could have severely altered our draft trajectory


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, panthers55 said:

I had read that the Eagles were hot for Thibideaux and were considering trading for our 6th. So the Giants did get what they wanted and we made the right choice because we had no trade down partner.  I would call that a win - win.

That would have sent him to a division rival.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

On one of the recap draft shows they theorized that if the Giants went tackle at 5 someone would have moved up to 6 for KT.

Looking at how it went, had we traded back more than 2-3 slots, we would have missed out ob Thibodeaux and all 3 tackles. For at best a 3rd. Which, magically, we still ended up with by swapping next years 3rd. And got one of the top QB prospects.

Philly had 15 and 18. If they had traded them to us for #6, we would have gotten Penning and Pickett. We didn't Hurney it up.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, cookinbrak said:

Looking at how it went, had we traded back more than 2-3 slots, we would have missed out ob Thibodeaux and all 3 tackles. For at best a 3rd. Which, magically, we still ended up with by swapping next years 3rd. And got one of the top QB prospects.

Philly had 15 and 18. If they had traded them to us for #6, we would have gotten Penning and Pickett. We didn't Hurney it up.

I think they tried to trade back a couple spots, hoping to get one of the tackles and 3rd.  Its alright, we still got the stud OT and potential QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have laughed at any team dumb enough to trade up for Thibodeaux.  It points to one of two things.  Either they don't know what they are doing...or they like job security and would have just blamed the coaching staff when the inevitable happens.  "He only had 7 sacks again?  Wow, that's so weird.  Maybe its the coaches and not the player I picked?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, joemac said:

Whatever. I could not be happier with how it worked out. I’m about positive we were dialed in on either Ickey or Neal however it would have played out. And getting Corral in the 3rd is just icing on the cake. 

I thought Rhule and Fitt looked a little subdued  after day one.  They said they asked other teams to trade down and the Giants screwed us taking the DE off the board.  The only thing that saved us was that the QB's dropped way lower than most were expecting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • For the silly people that worship her it will be that.  The Coleman 'legend' thing, they did that with another fairly average player that was here and I sort of mocked or questioned the 'legend' status. Instantly caught crap for insulting someone's favorite Panther. So okay, Kurt Coleman is a Legend. 
    • You allow him to compete--you all are talking as if I am proposing making him the starter. Give him a new coach, new weapons, good OL, etc. and see what happens. You are saying, "Well Damn.  It did not work for 3 guys..."  Right now, our C is injured, we lost our top 2 WRs.  Better question:  If you need a QB, Why would you not take a chance on bringing in a QB who was a former first rounder, a good arm, intelligence, mobility, youth, etc.  and see how he does out of NY--with a better OL, better running game, better receivers.  I am not saying give him a 10-year contract, I am saying give him a chance. You act like there is no improvement on offense here--it was a 2 year process, and next year is year 2.  To me, how can you sit there with Bryce and an opportunity to sign a veteran QB on the cheap comes available and you say--"Not us. We're good.  We are waiting for Patrick Mahommes."  Jone's problem is obviously mental--and he has little support.  Why is this so frigging hard to comprehend.  It is called "bottom fishing" and it is better than sitting in the boat.  
    • I think we're going to fall from behind quite early and be forced to abandon the run game.  3 rushes -2 yards 1 catch -10 yards 
×
×
  • Create New...