Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Saturday Draft Thread


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

We needed LB depth in a bad way. Do we have any picks left? It said we traded our two 5ths and 6th for that pick.

Well he shouldn't be depth if you invest 3 picks in him.

Could have gotten 3 LBs this year for depth. Jack Sanborn, Diego Fagot, and James Houston or one Brandon Smith?

Smith needs to start in 2 seasons or this is a waste. Even worse than the Devin Funchess trade. At least Funchess started for a bit before he was flushed.

Investing too much draft capital into individual players like Darnold, Corral, Marshall and Smith to even build a foundation.

Horrible front office.

  • Poo 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, CPantherKing said:

Well he shouldn't be depth if you invest 3 picks in him.

Could have gotten 3 LBs this year for depth. Jack Sanborn, Diego Fagot, and James Houston or one Brandon Smith?

Smith needs to start in 2 seasons or this is a waste. Even worse than the Devin Funchess trade. At least Funchess started for a bit before he was flushed.

Investing too much draft capital into individual players like Darnold, Corral, Marshall and Smith to even build a foundation.

Horrible front office.

LMAOOOOOOOOOOOO

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CPantherKing said:

Well he shouldn't be depth if you invest 3 picks in him.

Could have gotten 3 LBs this year for depth. Jack Sanborn, Diego Fagot, and James Houston or one Brandon Smith?

Smith needs to start in 2 seasons or this is a waste. Even worse than the Devin Funchess trade. At least Funchess started for a bit before he was flushed.

Investing too much draft capital into individual players like Darnold, Corral, Marshall and Smith to even build a foundation.

Horrible front office.

If you could read, you would see it was 2 picks, and we got one back...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CPantherKing said:

Well he shouldn't be depth if you invest 3 picks in him.

Could have gotten 3 LBs this year for depth. Jack Sanborn, Diego Fagot, and James Houston or one Brandon Smith?

Smith needs to start in 2 seasons or this is a waste. Even worse than the Devin Funchess trade. At least Funchess started for a bit before he was flushed.

Investing too much draft capital into individual players like Darnold, Corral, Marshall and Smith to even build a foundation.

Horrible front office.

Maybe it's time to log off and go outside lol

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CPantherKing said:

If you could read I said INVESTED 3 picks in 1 player. Obviously you have to invest at least 1 pick into 1 player. Don't get anything back. You get 1 player.

Draft a formal letter to the front office and give them a piece of your mind why don't ya

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CPantherKing said:

Well he shouldn't be depth if you invest 3 picks in him.

Could have gotten 3 LBs this year for depth. Jack Sanborn, Diego Fagot, and James Houston or one Brandon Smith?

Smith needs to start in 2 seasons or this is a waste. Even worse than the Devin Funchess trade. At least Funchess started for a bit before he was flushed.

Investing too much draft capital into individual players like Darnold, Corral, Marshall and Smith to even build a foundation.

Horrible front office.

1649469774464.jpg.5eae358a704a37522a82cdc37f3d64a8.jpg

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't get the Hunter hate. Just imagine his ceiling if he stopped trying to be this 2way freak and focused on one side of the ball 
    • 100%.  You have to play the cards that are dealt.  Not the cards you wish were dealt.
    • I'd say its definitely going to be addressed this off-season.  We went into the last draft with a roster of RBs including:  Chubba, Blackshear, and Miles Sanders. We picked Jonathan Brooks in the second and still signed Rashaad Penny afterwards.  Fast forward....One turned into a top 10 back, 1 is injured/out for most if not all the '25 season, 1 retired, 1 will either take a huge paycut or be cut, and the last is a restricted free agent. We brought in Mike Boone as well. Add him to the free agent list also.  We need a physical option.    Which qualifies:  Ashton Jeanty(Boise St): Overall ranked Top 10. Almost 2k yards after contact, 28 tds. Would take our first rounder. My money would be on an NFC East team selecting him. (97.2 PFF run grade) - 121 forced missed tackles.  Omarion Hampton(UNC): Ranked everywhere from 20 - 59 overall. Consensus #2 back after Jeanty. He'll be a second rounder. 1,222 Yards after contact w/ 15 tds.  (90.5 PFF run grade) - 72 forced missed Tackles Kaleb Johnson(Iowa): Ranked from 38 - 69 depending on which media outlet you prefer but generally #3. 2nd/3rd possibly. 1,060 Yards after contact w/ 21 tds.(86.7 PFF run grade)- 66 forced missed tackles Cam Skattebo: Ranked from the 50's - 104. Every mock I do he ends up BPA at some point. 969 Yards after contact w/ 17 tds(92 PFF Run Grade). Probably the best receiving back of the group. 81 forced missed tackles.  If the '24 and '25 draft classes were combined, IMO the rankings would be, in order: Jeanty, Hampton, Brooks, Johnson, Skattebo. I wouldn't take one high but I'd take one for Chubba and Brooks insurance. 
×
×
  • Create New...