Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Round 2-3 predictions. Do the Panthers get a pick,?

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

austin1227 Collaborator

austin1227

Posted
Posted
38 minutes ago, Stingray3030 said:

There is nowhere in my comments that even remotely says Robby is worth a first rounder.  I literally said we should trade him AND a 3rd to get into the 2nd round this year.

You said robby is worth Hollywood and AJ value; both of them were traded for first round picks. Now I see what you mean but robby is way worse than both of them lol

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
shaqattaq Grand Master

shaqattaq

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, bigdog10 said:

Need to take our medicine and not mortgage the future. Trading away next years picks for a second or third rounder seems like something a floundering franchise would do. 

I agree, BUT, I can easily see it happening if our QB hangs around. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beo Grand Master

beo

Posted
Posted (edited)

Robby is a negative asset in almost any potential trade unless we agree to eat his contract. There aren't any teams needy enough to trade for a WR3 on a 15 mil caphit. It'll probably take a future 2nd and our 4th, seeing as its the last pick in the 4th round, if we're moving up into the 2nd round. Maybe we could negotiate down to our 5th.

Edited by beo
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, beo said:

Robby is a negative asset in almost any potential trade unless we agree to eat his contract. There aren't any teams needy enough to trade for a WR3 on a 15 mil caphit. It'll probably take a future 2nd and our 4th, seeing as its the last pick in the 4th round, if we're moving up intp the 2nd round.

If they want a second rounder for a wr it's going to take Moore to get someone's attention. 

Edited by Jon Snow
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
cookinbrak Veteran

cookinbrak

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I mean, he had to say something to hedge his bets if Rhule threw a hissy fit in the war room and pulled rank and demanded they pick Pickett.

Go to panthers.com and watch the video of them actually calling Ickey. They were giving each other handies they were so excited.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beo Grand Master

beo

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

If they want a second rounder for a wr it's going to take Moore to get someone's attention. 

Yeah.. I felt as I typed that even my trade is a little bit lowbally. Usually the team moving up gives more value to the team moving down. Hopefully we don't overpay...

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Stingray3030 Proficient

Stingray3030

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, austin1227 said:

You said robby is worth Hollywood and AJ value; both of them were traded for first round picks. Now I see what you mean but robby is way worse than both of them lol

I meant wouldn't - but also those guys were not traded for first round picks - they had other picks included in the deal.  And I said that as well when I said package the same deal for a 2nd rounder vs 1st.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
trueblade Grand Master

trueblade

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Thats what it going to take. Or you can look at it as that we've already spent a second on a qb...

Frustrated Austin Powers GIF

I'm not trading Moore. He's a foundational piece. See what's there later in the second or even into the third and try to make a deal with a future 4th round pick or later, or offering someone like RA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • LinvilleGorge
      2024 College Football Thread

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...