Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Malik WIllis


janderson20vt
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'd put him more Tyrod Taylor category. I think he's significantly more talented than PJ but not nearly as talented as the folks who wanted him at #6 claim.

He's a developmental guy that you take a shot in the second round if you have 2 capable starters on and playoff team.

I think NO and Atlanta take one tomorrow but couldn't tell you who each would take.  I'm high and happy and don't gaf.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm not directly comparing the two, I'm just saying that a QB that fit the exact criteria of a guy who shouldn't be a 1st or 2nd round pick was targeted in a big trade up at #3 overall just last year.

For the record, I honestly don't want Willis.

I see what you're looking at because of the experience and Lance missing a season.. But physically its 2 different players.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Perfect prototypes have P5 offers. He ended up at NDSU (and Willis at Liberty via Auburn) for a reason. One or both may pan out but they're both projects.

Yeah 1 project was worth a bag in assets and the 3rd pick in the draft and the other isn't..

But they are both projects...are you good now??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
    • Not a chance the SEC could compete with the NFL.  In the large cities that are not in the Southeast, (LA, NYC, Chicago, SF) College football is an afterthought.  
×
×
  • Create New...