Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tepper says 5 year minimum for Rhule.


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Tepper appears to like Rhule in the rah rah role so he brought in football folks to run the front office and to actually coach the players.  This could work. 

So the HC of an NFL football team isn't a "football" guy and you think that's a winning formula? 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

The bonds were RH problem and again RH asked to not discuss this in the media...

Plain and simple RH defrauded in the original deal wanted to negotiate after the fact and Tepper said no..

Let's move on .

Bonds don't magically appear.  We know RH accuses Tepper of being a wrench in that.  Maybe he was, maybe he wasn't. 

Tepper has refused to answer all questions and did so before he nixed the deal and before RH allegedly  begged him not to say a word about anything and everything. 

again, good reporters don't not ask questions because rich people don't want to answer them.   

and to quote Tepper today, he is idiot and has made a lot of mistakes. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CRA said:

Bonds don't magically appear.  We know RH accuses Tepper of being a wrench in that.  Maybe he was, maybe he wasn't. 

Tepper has refused to answer all questions and did so before he nixed the deal and before RH allegedly  begged him not to say a word about anything and everything. 

again, good reporters don't not ask questions because rich people don't want to answer them.   

This isn't gotcha reporting or a big time news story at this point....

Once the guy says 3x he isn't answering the question why asked him 20 more times about it..

Especially when 70% of the fan base don't give a fug about Rock Hill..

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Shotgun said:

So the HC of an NFL football team isn't a "football" guy and you think that's a winning formula? 

It depends on how everyone's role is defined. When Rhule was making the decisions about personnel we made mistakes compounded by an inexperienced staff. With competent people running all phases of the actual football program and good office folks making personnel decisions, it means he can let the football folks do their job while he oversees everything but doesn't have to micromanage everything.  Rhule was a good college football guy but not a great NFL football guy although he is learning. If he allows his folks to do their job then no he doesn't have to know everything or be the smartest guy in the room. Often HCs spent more time managing people and herding cats than they do making up gameplans and doing Xs and Os.

Edited by panthers55
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

7 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

It depends on how everyone's role is defined. When Rhule was making the decisions about personnel we made mistakes compounded by an inexperienced staff. With competent people running all phases of the actual football program and good office folks making personnel decisions, it means he can let the football folks do their job while he oversees everything but doesn't have to micromanage everything.  Rhule was a good college football guy but not a great NFL football guy although he is learning. If he allows his folks to do their job then no he doesn't have to know everything or be the smartest guy in the room.

Call me crazy but I want a football guy for a HC. We will probably improve if he is kept away from football coaching decisions though.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Shotgun said:

 

Call me crazy but I want a football guy for a HC. We will probably improve if he is kept away from football coaching decisions though.  

Of course we all want the next Belichick, but my point was that if he stays in his lane and let the coordinators do their job we could be much improved despite him.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, panthers55 said:

Of course we all want the next Belichick, but my point was that if he stays in his lane and let the coordinators do their job we could be much improved despite him.

Hopefully that lane is one of the "football" people handing him a 20 and telling him to go see a movie...on game day. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What I really learned here is that the Carolina Panthers aren't anywhere near as bad as I initially thought they were earlier this year.  We've got a young and growing offense with some promising parts. But it still needs some tweaks and improvements.  We really still could still use a dominant #1 WR. But Chubba,  Legette, Coker,  and J.Sanders have generally looked decent. Bryce took a big leap after the benching. We can score enough points to keep pace with 2x defending super bowl champions, so offense isn't a huge issue. Main thing that needs improvement is defense. We sorely need a CB 2, and a number of new players at Dline and LB.  We're not quite as bad at edge with Wonnum showing promise.  But we definitely need 1 or 2 more edges Clowney is old.  Run D is probably worse prevailing theme these past couple years. We really need a good young stud or two to pair with Derrick Brown and another LB to pair up with Trevin Wallace. If Morgan and Canales can focus on rebuilding the defense this off-season and possibly going out and getting a #1 WR. This team could easily be somewhere around 7-10 to 10-7 and flirting with playoffs in 1 or 2 seasons. Overall this game has made me feel alot more positive about the direction of the team.
    • With our picks we need pass rush, lb, Safety, a speedster yac wr, o line depth and I still want a mid round qb. We got 9 picks and 8 in the first 5 rounds. If they pull Off another solid draft we be cooking. 
    • We had one passing touchdown against the Giants and one passing touchdown against the Chiefs today. Yes a good backup can replicate that. And that is why Andy Dalton in significantly less games has the same number of 30 point outings as Bryce Young. I am on board with you guys about wanting to be hopeful for the future. Today was a good performance to build on especially at home. But let's please keep things in perspective. BTW the Bucs who honestly aren't even that good blew the doors off the Giants today after we went to overtime against them with 17 points. Again. Perspective.
×
×
  • Create New...