Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why the Panthers should take a QB (article)


Growl
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Growl said:

There are people here who want an OT simply because they want an OT and no matter how much information is presented to them, they will turn and hide and simply wait for the next thread to pop up when the tide may be more favorable 

whether or it’s lingering biases on roster construction “gotta build those trenches!” or just a generally risk averse nature and a misguided belief that OTs are “safe,” people have dug their heels in and no matter how many seasons go by, no matter how many developmental QBs get drafted and excel in front of their very eyes, they are going to want an OT because it’s an nfl fortune cookieism that Hog Molly=Good and so you can’t go wrong taking one.

 

There are people here who want an OT at #6 because this is an OT draft.....and we haven't had a decent OL in a long time.   Which is the key cog along w/ QB to have offense in the NFL. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

In the best case scenario that you just posted above, how many wins do you see with rhule coaching?

With Baker behind a good OL? If CMC is healthy for a majority of the games thanks to the OL? If McAdoo is a decent OC and Campen has our new OL playing well quickly? If Horn stays healthy and plays to his draft status? If YGM shows any growth/development? If Brown plays more like his rookie vs his sophomore year? 
-Hard to tell. Anywhere from dead last to squeaking in as a wildcard…

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ForJimmy said:

With Baker behind a good OL? If CMC is healthy for a majority of the games thanks to the OL? If McAdoo is a decent OC and Campen has our new OL playing well quickly? If Horn stays healthy and plays to his draft status? If YGM shows any growth/development? If Brown plays more like his rookie vs his sophomore year? 
-Hard to tell. Anywhere from dead last to squeaking in as a wildcard…

Lot of ifs just for a wildcard spot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Churning through jack offs every 3 years is how you become the Jets and Browns.  

We’re already in jets and browns territory lol 5 years without a (healthy) franchise qb. This team is literally being built the way you want it so I don’t know why you’re in this thread complaining that other people want it done another way. 
 

this team is definitely taking a tackle and going after Jimmy or mayfield and if the tackle isn’t there they’re definitely going edge rusher. I will be the first to eat crow if they actually have the balls to draft Malik at 6.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

There are people here who want an OT at #6 because this is an OT draft.....and we haven't had a decent OL in a long time.   Which is the key cog along w/ QB to have offense in the NFL. 

thanks for pointing out that having good players is good, anyways, back to the matter at hand

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheRumGone said:

We’re already in jets and browns territory lol 5 years without a (healthy) franchise qb. This team is literally being built the way you want it so I don’t know why you’re in this thread complaining that other people want it done another way. 
 

this team is definitely taking a tackle and going after Jimmy or mayfield and if the tackle isn’t there they’re definitely going edge rusher. I will be the first to eat crow if they actually have the balls to draft Malik at 6.

This team is in no way being built how I want it to be.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Centerfield said:

There isn't one good reason to take a QB this year

Not at #6.  Not when you just own the #6 pick and your next is a 4th rounder. 

if we had been accumulating draft captial like a rebuilding team should.  Then yeah, we should find a way to add QB talent.   But still not at #6. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

Not at #6.  Not when you just own the #6 pick and your next is a 4th rounder. 

if we had been accumulating draft captial like a rebuilding should.  Then yeah, we should find a way to add QB talent.   But still not at #6. 

not this year. not with this group. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

It’s gonna be Pickett, fans are gonna have to accept that. We went to college teams pro days and only looked at QBs, it’s not gonna be anything else.

It’s not. I agree wholeheartedly with what TRG said. They’ve spent enormous resources on building the 1980’s football team that so many here want in accordance with Matt rhules archaic philosophy on football since he got here, and the fanbase will be the ones reaping the whirlwind, some of them gladly.

 

id love to be wrong but it seems pretty obvious they’re just gonna stay put and take the third best offensive tackle in the class, before drafting #10 next season when we’re all having the exact same discussion (well not me, pretty sure I’m done)

at this point it’s probably just best to hope the QBs don’t go to the teams you hate. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The other draft picks have turned out pretty well. Brooks will too.
    • I'm still not touching Hunter He again said the other day that he plans on playing both sides of the ball in the NFL.  If he is allowed to do that, he won't be as good on either side as his potential and he's going to have serious injury issues and have a short career.  If he's not allowed to do it, I think he's going to become a problem when the team isn't winning as he's going to feel him not being used on both sides of the ball is why. He's being coddled in that environment with Deion and I think it's doing a disservice to him to prepare him for life in the NFL where your coach isn't a 2nd father to you, to where you can just walk into his locker room and steal his shoes like Hunter does to Deion.
    • He’s a tad behind them. Around 15ish of 32 starters in the league. He’s well ahead of a lot of guys. Tua, Bryce, Cousins (present), Rodgers (current), Devito/Jones, Minshew, Russ (current), Watson, Smith, Carr, T Laws deep ball is weak as poo IMO, there’s plenty. And it’s not like everyone is ripping 60+ers. The key component is if you can rip and maintain velocity of the 30-40 yarders which he does super well. Legit every report out there from Brugler to PFF to PFN document him as good/above average arm strength.  Eye test tells me it’s pretty much that as well, slightly above average.
×
×
  • Create New...