Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Interesting


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, Lurk21 said:

I made a comment about Willis possibly going 2 to Detroit and a few thought it was funny but that is a somewhat possible  scenario. What some don't see though, is if that happens,  another team could trade up for Pickett. Regardless if a team trades up for Pickett or not, a ripple effect could happen. If Walker goes 1, Willis 2 and then Neal, Icky and Cross(because  a run on tackles or ends always happens) then at 6 you could have Hutchinson  sitting right there in your lap.  Before anyone laughs at that notion, look at the teams drafting ahead of us and it becomes very clear that it is some suspect front  offices...

I think the Jets would easily taken Hutchinson at 4. They struck out on DE in free agency. I can’t imagine them passing up on that. Then again, your guess is as good as mine.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Devin Lloyd

He will be a top 10 pick. Many teams are hoping he falls to the late first round, but there are a few teams positioning to trade up for him.

Panthers, Eagles, Saints, Seahawks, Chiefs, and Packers. Expect the Saints, Eagles, and Packers to try to trade up for the Panthers pick to jump the Seahawks for Devin Lloyd.

Panthers may decide Devin Lloyd is the defensive game changer they need. He is the perfect centerpiece for Snow's 33 defense.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, DeSim said:

I’m ok with it only if it’s Kayvon Thibodeaux. 

 

 But if he’s here when we pick and all the OTs are gone, i’m sure teams will be calling to trade up…and we better damn trade back if the deal is fair. 

Same Thibs and Burns would take the defense to another level. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Why would anyone be shocked? 

Under Rhule we've spent all our draft assets on D while trying to build an O off the NFL's trash heap.

 

And I hate him for it 

if he had a brain in that scruffy ass head  of his, year 1, LT or qb 

second year, the position you didn’t get in year 1 

in modern day NFK, these are the building blocks 

every single thing wrong with the Panthers is self inflicted.  All of it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nah I wanna see these NFL evaluators talking about his prospects at WR aren't good because I would LOVE to see thier explanations 
    • You do realize that raw stats don't make someone a better or worse player, right? To begin with, the last time I checked, 1,319 is more yards than 1,258, so T-Mac had more yards (but I'll forgive you as a typo there and say you meant catches lol), but that's before even factoring in that Hunter did his in 13 games vs 12 for T-Mac because Arizona didn't make a bowl game. It's also completely ignoring the team around each player.  If you think Hunter having the 8th place finisher in the Heisman voting at QB isn't going to result in helping his top WRs stats, then you're sticking your head in the sand to purposefully not see it. Hunter's QB had 353 completions for 4,134 yards and 37 TDs vs T-Mac's QB who had 260 completions for 2,958 yards and 18 TDs. But sure, let's rank NFL prospects by their stats and say the guy with more catches and TDs is the better prospect.  So on that note, I now change my mind, T-Mac is no longer the best WR in the draft, it's Nick Nash who had 104 rec, 1,382 yards, and 16 TDs, all numbers better than Hunter's... because that's how this is done, right? As I've said before, if someone wants to like a player better than someone else that's totally fair, but come with real reasons, talk about their play, but to talk about things like stats as your reasoning, when you ignore the obvious and massive flaws in using those stats in that way, just makes you look dumb.
    • Nah you don't go out and put up the numbers he did without being able to run routes dude is a football junky so he works on his craft he isn’t THAT much more athletic than other players to just be able to go out and do whatever and succeed at that level 
×
×
  • Create New...