Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Practice Facility Poll.


SizzleBuzz
 Share

Project resumes or permanently abandoned?  

131 members have voted

  1. 1. Will the Rock Hill facility project resume & ultimately be completed?



Recommended Posts

On 4/20/2022 at 10:52 AM, TheCasillas said:

good write up. Sounds like the Panthers did do their homework with this out they have in the deal. The pressure isnt on the panthers anymore, its on RH. They can easily build the facility on the other side of Moorehead, where they acquired the property late last year. 

*This*

If you've seen what the Cowboys have done in Frisco, TX and the Vikings with what they've done in Eagan, MN, they both include lots of retail. Restaurants, bars, shopping and Hall of Fames are included. This could have easily blended with Tepper's entertainment district that he wants included with the new stadium. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/20/2022 at 10:52 AM, TheCasillas said:

They can easily build the facility on the other side of Moorehead, where they acquired the property late last year. 

If you are referencing what I think you are that's only 4 acres and completely isolated from the stadium and current practice facilities...

...don't think that will work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SizzleBuzz said:

If you are referencing what I think you are that's only 4 acres and completely isolated from the stadium and current practice facilities...

...don't think that will work. 

thats not what i am speaking to. Its the old pipe and foundry land. It's rumored to be where the new stadium will go.

here is the link

https://www.wsoctv.com/news/local/david-tepper-buys-prime-land-near-bank-america-stadium/7WSWQBDXDBD2FHVZPGN2MY7D4I/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

thats not what i am speaking to. Its the old pipe and foundry land. It's rumored to be where the new stadium will go.

here is the link

https://www.wsoctv.com/news/local/david-tepper-buys-prime-land-near-bank-america-stadium/7WSWQBDXDBD2FHVZPGN2MY7D4I/

Tepper hasn't bought any CP&F land.

He controls what you see outlined in yellow and he only "owns" the small tract farthest from the stadium...it's about 4-acres.

The land outlined in blue is CP&F land, about 30-acres...the rest of the CP&F is across the highway.

If Tepper could take control of everything you see highlighted in red he'd have a legit stadium site 👊.

 

 

9069D2E7-6C57-4420-A0D6-DA80CA41097E.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Tepper hasn't bought any CP&F land.

He controls what you see outlined in yellow and he only "owns" the small tract farthest from the stadium...it's about 4-acres.

The land outlined in blue is CP&F land, about 30-acres...the rest of the CP&F is across the highway.

If Tepper could take control of everything you see highlighted in red he'd have a legit stadium site 👊.

 

 

9069D2E7-6C57-4420-A0D6-DA80CA41097E.jpeg

Thanks for the additional info, as of this moment its 4 acres, but the city agreeed to rezone it... the city would LOVE for Tepper to acquire the land and move the stadium further out from center. It would allow them to expand the skyline and use all of the existing space for commercial. The goal for the city by 2030 is to fill in the inner beltline as the new uptown. 

Tepper and the Panthers would be a piece to the puzzle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

the city agreeed to rezone it

Helpful to give CP&F more development options and a better  valuation, 100% irrelevant to what ultimately happens with/on the property.  

 

24 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

...the city would LOVE for Tepper to acquire the land and move the stadium further out...

Doesn't matter what "the city" wants...

...and, that's nowhere near enough land for a proper stadium 👍.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Other than being the offseason and there isn't much to talk about, why does anyone worry about the cap? We can do whatever we want and still have cap space. You don't think the front office hasn't already figured it out and what they intend to do. Me I am just sitting back and watching. After all my job isn't on the line if we lose. Although at my age we don't have forever if I am going to live to see us play in another superbowl
    • I get the TD's and I pointed it out, but like I said, when Burrow had more than double the TD's than Geno had, I think Higgins increased TDs compared to DK was more a product of Burrow and the Bengals offense than because of him vs DK as WRs. When one of their QB's finished 4th in MVP voting despite missing the playoffs and the other was just traded for a late 3rd round pick and replaced by Sam Darnold, I think that's a tough narrative to brush aside to just look at raw stats as well. Again, swap DK and Higgins last year, do you honestly believe DK wouldn't have put up better stats than Higgins did? Contracts and trade compensation aside, I'm taking DK over Higgins 100 out of 100 times, there is no debate about it for me.
    • More TDs last year in less games (double the TDs) and more yards per game. Those are some tough stats to brush aside. Career stats are good but we are wanting the player for what they are currently. DK had some drop issues too. 
×
×
  • Create New...