Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chinn to stay at safety...


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, AU-panther said:

Oustside of two freak plays what else did he do so much better in his rookie season? 

His rookie year was full of stops at/around the LOS and he had some pretty athletic PBUs. For me, it comes down to the question of how easy is it to replace what someone does; no one made a similar impact at the LOS last year, but his lack of standout play in the secondary may be easier to replace.

In the end it just comes down to usage. Whether they call him a safety, LB, whatever, the dude just needs to be around the LOS instead of playing center field. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

His rookie year they had to play him closer to the LOS out of necessity.  The linebackers were ass outside of Shaq so he had to play the run and the TE. Naturally he's pretty good at it and made an impact.  He should play safety however but I'm not sure they have solved the linebacker problems just yet.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Icege said:

In Chinn's rookie season when he lined up at LB often, he had:

  • 1 interception
  • 5 pass deflections
  • 2 forced fumbles
  • 2 fumble recoveries
  • 1 sack
  • 5 QB hits
  • 117 combined tackles (68 solo, 49 assists)
  • 2 tackles for loss

In his sophomore season at safety:

  • 1 interception
  • 5 pass deflections
  • 1 forced fumbles
  • 1 fumble recoveries
  • 1 sack
  • 5 QB hits
  • 107 combined tackles (75 solo, 32 assists)
  • 6 tackles for loss

After being moved 10yds further away from the line of scrimmage, Jeremy Chinn had only 10 less tackles (but 7 more solo tackles), 1 less fumble recovery, 1 less forced fumble, and 4 more tackles for loss.

I get that folks love their highlight reels, but how can anybody be claiming that he "disappeared" when the stats clearly show otherwise? Hell, he improved his TFLs while being 10yds further away from the line of scrimmage! 😮

 

1 hour ago, KSpan said:

His rookie year was full of stops at/around the LOS and he had some pretty athletic PBUs. For me, it comes down to the question of how easy is it to replace what someone does; no one made a similar impact at the LOS last year, but his lack of standout play in the secondary may be easier to replace.

In the end it just comes down to usage. Whether they call him a safety, LB, whatever, the dude just needs to be around the LOS instead of playing center field. 

More solo tackles in year 2.   More tackles for loss in year 2.  Same number of sacks.  Same QB hits.

The numbers don't back up the idea that he was more productive year 1.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

 

More solo tackles in year 2.   More tackles for loss in year 2.  Same number of sacks.  Same QB hits.

The numbers don't back up the idea that he was more productive year 1.

 

For the fourth time now, the point is that he didn't make anywhere near the impact this year spending half his time roaming the deep third. The stats alone don't tell the story, but since you keep citing them he also only played 15 games his rookie year vs 16 this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, KSpan said:

For the fourth time now, the point is that he didn't make anywhere near the impact this year spending half his time roaming the deep third. The stats alone don't tell the story, but since you keep citing them he also only played 15 games his rookie year vs 16 this year.

and how exactly did he make the impact??

Just because you made a tackle close to the line of scrimmage doesn't mean he is making a big impact if another LB would have made the same.

Under your logic if he makes a tackle 2 yards past the LOS he is making more of an impact than if he making a tackle 5 yards past the LOS.  That is incomplete logic.

What if that tackle he makes at 2 yards past the LOS another LB would have made one yard past the LOS then its not really impressive.  Then what if that tackle 5 yards past the LOS another safety would have made 6 yards past the LOS?  All of a sudden the tackle further back is more impressive.

You can't just look at where a tackle is made to judge a player.  There is so much more that goes into it.  Its all relative to how a replacement player would have produced in the same situation.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Patience… he’ll be our Lynch/Polamalu/Reed… not saying he’s the 2nd coming of any of them, but he is gon’ be Our Guy, watch what I tell you….

 

when he gets to the point of having free reign, Chinn will have open season for a few seasons….

Edited by j2sgam
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, KSpan said:

For the fourth time now, the point is that he didn't make anywhere near the impact this year spending half his time roaming the deep third. The stats alone don't tell the story, but since you keep citing them he also only played 15 games his rookie year vs 16 this year.

Did we field a top 10 rush defense his rookie year?

Nope. 

We did field a top 10 pass defense.  

Pretty obvious where the larger impact was. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

Did we field a top 10 rush defense his rookie year?

Nope. 

We did field a top 10 pass defense.  

Pretty obvious where the larger impact was. 

Seriously? Teams also attempted the second fewest pass plays against Carolina (515) in the entire league because they didn't need to; 585 were attempted against them in 2020 and that was with 1 less game played. The team also gave up 26 passing TDs (middle of the pack) and had a rate in the bottom third. With regards to rush defense Carolina was 28th in the league in 'explosive run plays' on defense, giving them up 12% of the time.

Yet again, your stat doesn't tell the actual story.

Edited by KSpan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, KSpan said:

Seriously? Teams also attempted the second fewest pass plays against Carolina (515) in the entire league because they didn't need to; 585 were attempted against them in 2020 and that was with 1 less game played. The team also gave up 26 passing TDs (middle of the pack) and had a rate in the bottom third. With regards to rush defense Carolina was 28th in the league in 'explosive run plays' on defense, giving them up 12% of the time.

Yet again, your stat doesn't tell the actual story.

Yet you have no stats to support your biased opinion at all. Thanks for playing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

Yet you have no stats to support your biased opinion at all. Thanks for playing. 

Biased toward what exactly? Not my fault the stats you and others cite don't support your point and that you have nothing to refute mine. I'm not even saying he was bad at safety, just that he was more impactful in his 2020 role.

Hell, there's not even a 2021 Jeremy Chinn highlight video - there are tons of them for 2020. Definitive/scientific? In no way, shape, or form. But interesting that arguably Carolina's second-best defender doesn't warrant the same attention this year, not even in the team's annual defensive recap video.

Compare to 2020, when the team highlighted him exclusively. Here's 4 defensive plays alone (one was his ST fake run).

Call it whatever position they want, but keep the man near the LOS.

Edited by KSpan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • For the silly people that worship her it will be that.  The Coleman 'legend' thing, they did that with another fairly average player that was here and I sort of mocked or questioned the 'legend' status. Instantly caught crap for insulting someone's favorite Panther. So okay, Kurt Coleman is a Legend. 
    • You allow him to compete--you all are talking as if I am proposing making him the starter. Give him a new coach, new weapons, good OL, etc. and see what happens. You are saying, "Well Damn.  It did not work for 3 guys..."  Right now, our C is injured, we lost our top 2 WRs.  Better question:  If you need a QB, Why would you not take a chance on bringing in a QB who was a former first rounder, a good arm, intelligence, mobility, youth, etc.  and see how he does out of NY--with a better OL, better running game, better receivers.  I am not saying give him a 10-year contract, I am saying give him a chance. You act like there is no improvement on offense here--it was a 2 year process, and next year is year 2.  To me, how can you sit there with Bryce and an opportunity to sign a veteran QB on the cheap comes available and you say--"Not us. We're good.  We are waiting for Patrick Mahommes."  Jone's problem is obviously mental--and he has little support.  Why is this so frigging hard to comprehend.  It is called "bottom fishing" and it is better than sitting in the boat.  
    • I think we're going to fall from behind quite early and be forced to abandon the run game.  3 rushes -2 yards 1 catch -10 yards 
×
×
  • Create New...