Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers terminating Rock Hill project agreements


Dorian Gray
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, SizzleBuzz said:

So specifically which code-violation would you cite Tepper for?

Would you like tape the ticket to one of the steel girders on the unfinished super-structure and hope someone finds it?

Mail it?  

Hand deliver to Mint Street?

What kind of fines are we talking about?

$100?  $1000?

😂🤣

Read Sections 10, 12 and 13 of the City of Rock Hill Municipal Code.

Edited by Anybodyhome
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

@SizzleBuzz

the above would be another great look for the billionaire of the community 

I doubt it gets that far.  Tepper IMO will attempt to make a deal with someone.  But it’s not an easy deal because no one in RH has use for that type structure. 

I tend to believe this is a lot of legal and financial tap-dancing that will allow everyone to get their place at the table and the projects gets finished sooner or later.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Shufdog said:

Based on your responses in this thread, I'd say you very much care! Lol!! 

Just outside looking in. 

Nah. Just amused 😆

In the past, I've actually given him some advice to try to help him fit in because I know a little of what's behind the front he puts up. But these days he only wants to insult everyone else's take to try and claim he knows better so my sympathy has run out.

Think cat...ball of yarn...that's our relationship now.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Shufdog said:
13 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Your grade school graduation certificate doesn't count, dude 😃 

Expand  

Based on your responses in this thread, I'd say you very much care! Lol!! 

Just outside looking in. 

When provided facts/info that runs counter to whatever uninformed notion he has the time (bankruptcy was never part of the plan) and is further called out by other huddlers like@Tbe Carnac then says "oh you just copied that from somewhere else" and then doubles down

...and makes up a stone cold lie!

Then he won't defend that and stops replying directly but starts making petty personal insults in response to others and then when called out on that he won't put his money where his mouth is 🤦‍♂️.

Carnac, let's make a bet on academic credentials...

...the loser logs off and never comes back -- whadya say?

Edited by SizzleBuzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

When provided facts/info that runs counter to whatever uninformed notion he has the time (bankruptcy was never part of the plan) and is further called out by other huddlers like@Tbe Carnac then says "oh you just copied that from somewhere else" and then doubles down

...and makes up a stone cold lie!

Then he won't defend that and stops replying directly but starts making petty personal insults in response to others and then when called out on that he won't put his money where his mouth is 🤦‍♂️.

Carnac, let's make a bet on academic credentials...

...the loser logs off and never comes back -- whadya say?

You're not far from getting banned. The shtick is getting beyond old. It basically just comes down to which one of the mods gets tired enough of it to pull the trigger but keep it up and it's coming and none of us are going to be willing to save you when it happens.

Fair warning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

When provided facts/info that runs counter to whatever uninformed notion he has the time (bankruptcy was never part of the plan) and is further called out by other huddlers like@Tbe Carnac then says "oh you just copied that from somewhere else" and then doubles down

...and makes up a stone cold lie!

Then he won't defend that and stops replying directly but starts making petty personal insults in response to others and then when called out on that he won't put his money where his mouth is 🤦‍♂️.

Carnac, let's make a bet on academic credentials...

...the loser logs off and never comes back -- whadya say?

You made bets under your Sanjay ID too, and when you lost them refused to even acknowledge you made the bet. As I recall, that was one of the things that helped get you banned😆

40 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You're not far from getting banned. The shtick is getting beyond old. It basically just comes down to which one of the mods gets tired enough of it to pull the trigger but keep it up and it's coming and none of us are going to be willing to save you when it happens.

Fair warning.

Looks like you're on your way to losing this one anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You're not far from getting banned. The shtick is getting beyond old. It basically just comes down to which one of the mods gets tired enough of it to pull the trigger but keep it up and it's coming and none of us are going to be willing to save you when it happens.

Fair warning.

Understood.

That said, look, I’m just defending myself against lies and unfair attacks. 

I take the time to give the guy a thoughtful primer on the strategic benefits of incorporation and how bankruptcy is part of the corporate toolkit and his response is “you copied that from somewhere else” (I didn’t) and then tells a bold-faced lie saying I said Tepper’s whole plan for this project from the get-go was bankruptcy — not only his statement completely illogical, I did not say it.

The academic credentials bet is a result of Carnac taking unwarranted potshots at me personally, just trying to get him to put his money where his mouth is (he never will, all hat, no 🐄🐄🐄).

FTR, I am not Sanjay…literally have no idea who that is.  Nor am I “Chuck”…no idea who that is either. 

In closing, I will say my graduate degree is of the Ivy variety😎👊.

Cheers mate…

PS…I’ll mute the guy, will make it a lot easier to get through threads as they will all be 50% shorter 🤣.

Edited by SizzleBuzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Understood.

That said, look, I’m just defending myself against lies and unfair attacks. 

I take the time to give the guy a thoughtful primer on the strategic benefits of incorporation and how bankruptcy is part of the corporate toolkit and his response is “you copied that from somewhere else” (I didn’t) and then tells a bold-faced lie saying I said Tepper’s whole plan for this project from the get-go was bankruptcy — not only his statement completely illogical, I did not say it.

The academic credentials bet is a result of Carnac taking unwarranted potshots at me personally, just trying to get him to put his money where his mouth is (he never will, all hat, no 🐄🐄🐄).

FTR, I am not Sanjay…literally have no idea who that is.  Nor am I “Chuck”…no idea who that is either. 

In closing, I will say my graduate degree is of the Ivy variety😎👊.

Cheers mate…

PS…I’ll mute the guy, will make it a lot easier to get through threads as they will all be 50% shorter 🤣.

Haven't learned a thing, have you? 🙄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/3/2022 at 8:28 PM, Ja Rhule said:

Fort Mill does not have the 

On 6/3/2022 at 6:53 PM, MitchConner said:

Fort Mill doesn’t have the land and why would anyone deal with Tepper now anyways?

They would not lay down the red carpet like Tipper did.  I don’t see how anyone would now.  You ever see what former abandoned Olympic sites look like?  That can be what they did to Rock Hill.  Rock Hill is too busy anyways.  It’s a total cluster though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We could easily pick apart yesterday’s game: dropped passes, blown coverages, bad tackling and red zone issues to name a few. But it was clear that this wasn’t the same team from earlier in the season. They fought back and hung with the champs until the end. That’s what I was excited to see and it gives me hope that we’re on the right track.
    • I think BY played well today and exceeded expectations. I will temper future expectations as he has to string together many games of consistent quality. One game doesn’t convince me that he is a franchise QB or even a guy you want to stick with for another season. One game doesn’t erase all the negative play and limitations from the past couple of years. I hope he balls out and continues to get better but for me the verdict is still out   That said, I think he gave the team and fans hope yesterday which is a lot more than what we had when we woke up Sunday morning. 
    • He was vastly improved today and we need to see more of Bryce the rest of the season to continue evaluate him in order to decide what the heck to do with him at the end of the season. He must play at least like this and improve more from here the rest of the season in order for me to keep him. No more 123 yard passing games and want to see at least this output weekly from him. If this is Bruce improving slowly over time then Canales is even better with developing QB's than I thought he was but still too early to tell and we need to see him the rest of the way as he has at very least earned back the starting gig moving forward.
×
×
  • Create New...