Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Alexander predicts we get Garoppolo or Mayfield


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

What would be the expected price for either? Reasonable, or are we giving away another ton of draft capital?

Both teams want them off the roster and neither really have a lot of options. It's not going to be very expensive.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Jmac said:

Why would anyone want a player who doesn't want to play here? Mayfield has stated this (from what I understand). Just a lot of trouble and hassle for the team.

I thought baker said he wanted to play here? It was posted on here a few weeks back from one of his podcast interviews.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Verge said:

Both teams want them off the roster and neither really have a lot of options. It's not going to be very expensive.

Who do you think is the better fit?  Doesn't sound like McAdoo is too high on Mayfield according to the reports that surfaced before the draft that year.  Do you think they prefer JG? Also I would be interested on how you think the top 6 picks go this year based on the info you have gathered. Thanks Verge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Verge said:

Both teams want them off the roster and neither really have a lot of options. It's not going to be very expensive.

49er's can straight up cut Jimmy G and only be on the hook for $1.4M. They're in no rush, can just wait it out til week one if they wanted to before cutting him, though I think they're gonna try to not disrespect him if possible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jimmy G is the game manager that Rhule has been searching for. If he is the Panthers' starting QB this coming season, then as far as I'm concerned the only way for Rhule's job to be safe is to make the playoffs (and not be embarrassed in the first round).

Maybe it's the homer in me, but with an LT @ #6, JimmyG at QB, and one more solid edge rusher they just might be able to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

49er's can straight up cut Jimmy G and only be on the hook for $1.4M. They're in no rush, can just wait it out til week one if they wanted to before cutting him, though I think they're gonna try to not disrespect him if possible. 

A) If he is cut why would he come here?
B) For us to entice him here he is going to want a teddy b type contract

 

 

fug that noise

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

A) If he is cut why would he come here?
B) For us to entice him here he is going to want a teddy b type contract

 

 

fug that noise

Exactly my issue. We are the only team willing to trade anything for him and take on $26M for another one year rental, only because if he hits FA he's not willingly coming into this mess. If we were confident we could get him on a decent deal we'd just wait for him to get cut like anyone else slightly interested is doing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And let me add this here for Pickett fans😀

"I wanna go on the record about this, too,” he said while referencing the 2016 photo of Pickett and Rhule at Temple University. “And fans, you can come at me if I’m wrong on this. I will be shocked if the Panthers pick Kenny Pickett at six. I will be shocked. I wanna put that out on the record so anyone can challenge me when it happens."

-Jonathan Alexander

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2022/04/15/panthers-kenny-pickett-2022-nfl-draft-charlotte-observer/

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...