Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Christensen vs The Draft Prospects


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

What do you believe?

Very few people "in the building" have shown they know how to evaluate OLine talent given the 6-7 seasons -  look at the money wasted and lack of production.  If he is then great, it gives you a perceived flexibility in the draft - not proven - still a big risk.

But even if he is capable he is already a versatile guy who can play other positions - and given how shallow our OLine skills are the best option is probably still to take the best LT available and have an inexpensive, high performing OLine for 3-4 more years.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess a better question might be if BC has the ability/trajectory to be an elite LG?  Or will he be a good enough tackle?  If he's looks like he'll be the same value as an OT or OG, then I still think you pick the better OL.  

I don't think you can hurt yourself as much if you pick the best LT prospect at 6.  If you WHIFF on a QB.... not only have you missed an elite LT, but you've also screwed up the QB position, again!

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean, he really didn't look like some stud even if they think he can play LT.  He seems like an alright, serviceable guy.  Long term depth swing lineman, filler LT starter.  

I'm all about it this way:

1. Icky Ekwonu/Charles Cross/Evan Neal

2. Trade Down (no lower than 18-20)

3. Garrett Wilson

4. Corral/Willis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The problem with drafting a DE/EDGE high in the 1st is the bust factor.  That position group busts at a scary rate.  We HAVE to hit our first 3 rounds.  Cant take chances on tweeners or potential guys.
    • Man folks right on this site said Deion was gonna follow his son to the nfl and have a big impact on his draft stock with his interference and yet we have seen no such thing. He just signed an extension to stay in Colorado for the foreseeable future. The only thing we have seen is so called experts try to tank shedeurs stock with false accusations and rumors and deion just had to step in and shut it down. This why you have to stop listening to what certain people say. Too much hate and emotion in most opinions. 
    • That's sound logic! I think we could make a case for a few players. I know its not popular  with a few but Warren gives to the  identity we want. Tremble is mostly a blocker. Sanders flashed late but mostly a receiving  threat at the moment. Warren is an automatic 1st down, run blocks, runs the ball and can even line up and throw it. To me he is if you took the Taysom Hill and actually could play tight end too. I just think looking at Goedert, Kelce,  Laporta, Hoeckenson, Baltimore Tight ends, Knox and Kindcaid and etc... all the  last few teams had stellar Tight end play. Warren allows you to be unpredictable  on offense bc he is equally good at being a target, as he is a blocker. Don't want to run Bryce on a qb sneak, plug Warren in with the threat to pass. I would be happy with him, Walker or a few others. As long as the player isn't riding the bench year 1. 
×
×
  • Create New...