Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Thinking of renting MW 2, don't have online...

thefuzz

By thefuzz,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

stankowalski Newbie

stankowalski

Posted
Posted

I was in the same boat as you fuzz. I don't have high speed internet service in my area so as a consequence of that I don't buy games that lean on MP. Thanks to searching the internet and finding a way to go online using my Palm Pre as a modem I can now get on Xbox Live. So I bought MW2. What I will tell you is that had I not been able to get on Xbox Live, this would be a rent for me. It's a great game, but the single player campaign is short. It does have the Special Ops which are kind of like scenarios that you can play through and that does improve the overall offering for single players. But for 60 bucks, I'd want a little longer single player experience if I were relying on that.

It is a great game though, either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
thefuzz Mentor

thefuzz

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The single player is short but all so sweet, I went through it on regular in 4 1/2 hours currently workingon veteran.

Do you recommend starting on Veteran rather than regular.

I beat MW 1 in about 4 hours on regular last time, and would rather have a bit more of a challenge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Doc Holiday Grand Master

Doc Holiday

Posted
Posted

Do you recommend starting on Veteran rather than regular.

I beat MW 1 in about 4 hours on regular last time, and would rather have a bit more of a challenge.

I don't know, if you've played the others on veteran then yes but if not going through on regular or at least hardcore first would be recommended.

And yes veteran will be more challenging, when the game mentions that you will not survive they aren't joking, you will die..... A lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
thefuzz Mentor

thefuzz

Posted
  • Author
Posted

LOL...yeah that camera is wicked at times.

I get pretty sick in cars, and also on planes during turbulance....and every now and again playing games...it wasn't a shock seeing as I was totally "into it" and not taking breaks.

Took me about 2 hours to not feel like I was about to blow chunks.:D

The oil rig mission is the one that took me down....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • jessicasmith0
      Does JetBlue have free cancellation?

      By jessicasmith0 · Posted

      https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • tukafan21
      Mason Graham Bandwagon

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • Carolina Mike
      Mason Graham Bandwagon

      By Carolina Mike · Posted

      This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...