Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fitterer on trading out of the #6 pick


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Shocker said:

Sigh…what would you suggest we do right now?  Pretty simple stuff…but I am trying to get you there

Take the best left tackle at 6.  Make rhule run it back with darnold for next season.  Especially since he talked him up and gave up draft capital for him.   If that doesn’t work fire rhule hire a new guy and draft a new qb in the first so they come up together.  This isn’t rocket science.  
 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Oh, I can think of plenty.

Nah.  It’s simple.  We aren’t giving up draft capital for a hurt qb on a 1 year deal when we have darnold eating a cool 18 mill.    If in the unlikely event he gets cut we are not giving jimmy g a multi year deal to come here.  
 

 

in closing jimmy g isn’t coming to Charlotte 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Nah.  It’s simple.  We aren’t giving up draft capital for a hurt qb on a 1 year deal when we have darnold eating a cool 18 mill.    If in the unlikely event he gets cut we are not giving jimmy g a multi year deal to come here.  
 

 

in closing jimmy g isn’t coming to Charlotte 

You're not factoring in a desperate coach and an owner desperate for NFL caliber QB play. You seem to be expecting the Panthers to suddenly start making rational moves at QB. I don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Take the best left tackle at 6.  Make rhule run it back with darnold for next season.  Especially since he talked him up and gave up draft capital for him.   If that doesn’t work fire rhule hire a new guy and draft a new qb in the first so they come up together.  This isn’t rocket science.  
 

 

So if Neal, Cross and Ikey are gone what then?  You are not as smart a person as Matt Rhule so I will leave coaching to him.  Easy to sit behind a computer and question everyone when you aren’t vested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

 If in the unlikely event he gets cut we are not giving jimmy g a multi year deal to come here. 

With their stated and historic aversion to drafting QBs, why wouldn't they offer a multi-year deal?  They essentially gave Darnold a 2 year by picking up his 5th year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, poundaway said:

With their stated and historic aversion to drafting QBs, why wouldn't they offer a multi-year deal?  They essentially gave Darnold a 2 year by picking up his 5th year.

They have gotten burned on teddy and darnold.  They have to have learned their lesson by now.  Third time the charm and all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You're not factoring in a desperate coach and an owner desperate for NFL caliber QB play. You seem to be expecting the Panthers to suddenly start making rational moves at QB. I don't.

I think (hope) by getting burned 2 years in a row that they will pump the brakes a bit.  Plus he is hurt.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You're not factoring in a desperate coach and an owner desperate for NFL caliber QB play. You seem to be expecting the Panthers to suddenly start making rational moves at QB. I don't.

They might reach…the media is totally expecting this.  If we don’t we have to give Fitty credit.  I think Fitty knows talent…he just needs time.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • his height, size and arm will forever cause problems and limitations...that is what it is.  I think to a degree, the law of averages is just coming into play a bit with him.  So as he plays more and more, you just flat out get the decent days mixed in too.  Which is just going to happen. 
    • Good point. He's definitely better in 10-15 yards. I think that's his biggest improvement. But he wasn't 3-10 +15, he was 3-7, with at least one drop (minor but still). And with multiple passes at 14 yards completed. This passing chart doesn't look like at By one, lol. He threw more "deep" passes than Mahomes (NOT comparing him to Mahomes in a skill way lol), or at least more beyind 10 yards.
    • Karlaftis and Danna have been pretty inconsistent so teams have been doubling Jones and able to contain their pass rush.   But the good thing is that yesterday, we schemed well against Steve Spags Defense, Canales married the surrounding personnel with his QB through play designs within his comfort zone and was able to get downfield at will.  He was able to execute higher difficulty throws and look a lot more comfortable.  It tells me that Canales has a good system in mind, and had an edge gameplanning wise against Spagnuolo - which is nice to see.  It's a bit to see-saw at times with either going way too pass heavy or way too run heavy, but I think he's finding out what works.  It takes time to have it come together, and sure, I could see regression happen against a better front-7, but this was good for the entire system gelling.    
×
×
  • Create New...