Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

KC looking to trade up into top 10.

DaveThePanther2008
 Share

Recommended Posts

mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

I am. I prefer to be in our current situation than in one where we’re locked into Fields for 3 more years without Horn. At least there is light at the end of the tunnel with Darnold’s last year under contract here. Fields, to date, is another Darnold and I’m glad we’re not locked into that longer term. 

I mean, everyone is entitled to their opinion but holy fug thats a lot to stomach.  You would rather have Darnold then Fields for 2022.  got it

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ECHornet Grand Master

ECHornet

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I mean, everyone is entitled to their opinion but holy fug thats a lot to stomach.  You would rather have Darnold then Fields for 2022.  got it

They were the same garbage last year. 
 

Yes, I’d rather only be locked into subpar QB play for 1 year instead of 3. Why would you prefer the opposite? Hope that Fields improves? Yea, we did that with Darnold. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ENCPantherfan2 Collaborator

ENCPantherfan2

Posted
Posted

I rather do it with the Packers. Both their 1sts, 1 of their 2nds, next year's 3rd, and Jordan Love should be enough. You address the QB situation by giving Daronld competition , and if Love works out a long term solution, picks to use at both D-line and O-line, and a 2nd for additional depth. Packers can go and get Aaron Rodgers on the of the best WRs in the class (Wilson, Olave, etc.) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
firefox1234 Grand Master

firefox1234

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, ECHornet said:

They were the same garbage last year. 
 

Yes, I’d rather only be locked into subpar QB play for 1 year instead of 3. Why would you prefer the opposite? Hope that Fields improves? Yea, we did that with Darnold. 

At least Fields would actually be a rookie and not “basically a rookie” like Darnold…

Edited by firefox1234
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ECHornet Grand Master

ECHornet

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, firefox1234 said:

At least Fields would actually be a rookie and not “basically a rookie” like Darnold…

He’s not a rook anymore. A second year QB that has been less successful than Trubisky in similar situations. Everyone ragged on Mitch while many here covet Fields. I don’t get it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SOJA Veteran

SOJA

Posted
Posted

according to this draft chart: https://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart.asp?RequestTeam=car

The Chiefs would have to trade us 29, 30 and 50 in order to make it equitable (we'd likely have to give them a fifth rounder too)

 

I'm for trading down but if Evans, Ickey or even Cross is at 6 you have to wonder whether or not a franchise LT is worth more than those picks. God forbid all three of those are gone I do this trade in a heartbeat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basbear
      Edge Rushers

      By Basbear · Posted

      These last couple playoff/championship games for the edge class will mean millions. Someone will have a big game and become the favorite top edge. Everything is on the line for the edge group now.  
    • tukafan21
      What Are Your Top Offseason Targets Now That Bryce Young Is Showing Promise?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Because he's not the best prospect in the draft, he's the best college player in the draft, and those are two entirely different things. Yes, if he focused on one side, his stats may have been better, but stats aren't what makes a player's prospects, it's their abilities and how they translate to the next level. I'm also not knocking him as a prospect, not like I'm saying he's a mid round pick, he's just probably the 2nd best CB and 3rd best WR, in what way is that throwing shade on him?  It's literally saying he's a Top 10 pick, just not THE top prospect at his position(s).  I really don't get why you think someone saying a player is the 2nd best player at one position and 2nd or 3rd best at another position is hating on them, it's crazy talk. Even in your defense of him here, you say a just asinine sentence, "he's the #1 rated prospect because he's actually elite at both positions" His ability at 2 positions has 0% bearing on his NFL prospects, as no team is going to use him full time both ways, he's either going to be a full time WR, or a mostly full time CB who gets 5 or so snaps a game on offense.   So him playing both positions shouldn't factor into any team's draft evaluation of him, if a team is taking him over Johnson because of the few snaps he'd play on offense, they're choosing a player for the wrong reason.  The only way I'm taking him over T-Mac is if it's a team that already has a true outside #1 and what they need is speed in the slot to compliment the outside guy (and btw, most teams don't have that, if anything, most would have the slot guy and need the true outside #1).
    • LinvilleGorge
      Week 13 other games

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Remember when @CamWhoaaCam didn't bandwagon that team that was having a surprisingly good season?  
×
×
  • Create New...