Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Duke / UNC game thread


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Two questions since I don’t want to try and find the posts about them but was Manek’s goal tending really a goal tend and how in the world was Braun able to throw up an air ball and catch his own air ball a half second later and put it in? You can’t pass to yourself and Love never touched the ball. Those two plays were very close to each other. The announcers never said anything and they didn’t replay and talk about them.

Didn't look like goal tending to me and the crowd reaction was pretty telling on the replay they got and we didn't. TV coverage of this tourney was poo. Too much pushing their narrative and not enough showing of replays of key plays and actually telling us what's going on. So many times they'd be talking about whatever and I'm trying to figure out was it a foul? If so on who? Or did they call traveling, out of bounds? I have no idea what's going on because they're talking about who knows what and showing shots of the crowd.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Didn't look like goal tending to me and the crowd reaction was pretty telling on the replay they got and we didn't. TV coverage of this tourney was poo. Too much pushing their narrative and not enough showing of replays of key plays and actually telling us what's going on. So many times they'd be talking about whatever and I'm trying to figure out was it a foul? If so on who? Or did they call traveling, out of bounds? I have no idea what's going on because they're talking about who knows what and showing shots of the crowd.

I realized yesterday that Grant Hill has some really, awful, analysis sometimes. 

Kind of glad Raftery has quit the "look at this kid" lines over and over again. Shitt was annoying after a while. 

Edited by NCTHFL0567
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

Yes we can they lost after one of biggest leads. We have a lot to say, it would be no different the other way around.

Oh you CAN, it just looks really really dumb…  They pretty much owned Coach K twice, while Duke had a much better team and UNC had a rookie coach. Duke fans should probably lay low for a while. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Oh you CAN, it just looks really really dumb…  They pretty much owned Coach K twice, while Duke had a much better team and UNC had a rookie coach. Duke fans should probably lay low for a while. 

Much better team is an understatement. Duke has 4 first rounders, and 1 second rounder/borderline first rounder right now. 

https://www.tankathon.com/mock_draft

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, stbugs said:

That’s what I thought and I heard the replay of the goal tend by the crowd. I don’t know why they don’t check goal tending on the replays but that pass to himself was ridiculous. That was a big 4 point swing right there. I think Kansas probably still wins because UNC couldn’t buy a bucket in the 2nd half. Love needed to do some fakes/drives with passing because he was bricking the poo out of the basket.

Yeah Love was definitely not having a good night. I wonder how much him rolling his ankle affected his shot. What's crazy is we still had a chance to take the lead and possibly win with just under a minute to go. But when Bacot, went down that basically sealed it.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very proud of these Tar Heels!! Their first possession in the second half you could tell that they were going to work clock and take good shots. But,it never works out to take foot off gas. Kansas was deeper and stronger. It might have hurt less getting blown out. BUT, it was a GREAT EFFORT!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That’s a book of the great life that the Panthers have had. So great to look back on the great players and seasons that we have had. But I think the book could have been twice the size. We have had a good 30 years, up and down the standings. i know we are in a bad spot right now, but hopefully before long we will be climbing back towards that Super Bowl championship 
    • LmAO ..it does not make any sense whatsoever why a team that is currently 2-0 would  trade their backup Qb to a team that is 0-2 & in the same NFC conference ? & what is Seattle going to do if Geno Smith is injured ? wouldn't a team that is  currently 2-0 & is quiet  possibly going to the playoffs  want a decent plan B that already knows how to operate their system & has some form of chemistry with their players  , like I said before this is the NFL &teams especially ones like Seattle  are NOT going to trade their backup Qb 2 games into the regular season...just saying
    • Yeah, I can see that happening, but my only thing is, whoever he goes to, it's going to be a bad team. Not a whole lot of difference between us and say Denver, Jax, the Giants or the Colts. Of course, we're probably worse, but not by that much. Manning would have to pick his poison.
×
×
  • Create New...