Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Charlotte Observer reports "there's a strong chance" QB Sam Darnold will be the Panthers' Week 1 starter.


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Imagine all these takes in retrospect if we take a LT that busts and leave a guy on the board who becomes a franchise QB. 

giphy.webp?cid=6c09b95292dd39f71e88c0927

There is always the possibility of a bust. Either way. It's a simple risk /reward calculation. Drafting a QB in the top ten, that actually has a second round grade is very different from drafting one of three LTs projected to be around top ten talent.

Let Darnold and Rhule flame out. We should not pour further resources into them.

Imagine us taking a backup level QB and therefore passing on a high level LT. tenor.gif  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I didn't like him because of how OU used him. But I sure wish we had the chance to draft him.

That's basically what I mean though. Love 'em or hate 'em as prospects we'll all be a lot better off if we land a legit QB.

 

 

Comparing Herberts talent to this years QB class is nothing but a reach though. If there was a Hebert type QB of course that changes things. I just don't like reaching, while passing on a "shure shot".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, bigdog10 said:

This is a garbage take. The psl owners built this franchise. Put a winning team on the field and you won’t have to beg for support. Your condescending tone towards the people who helped fund a team being here is ignorant. 

Helped fund a team being in Charlotte, and now profit from it on a yearly basis. 

There is no home field advantage at Bank of America Stadium because this fairweather, profiteering culture is encouraged. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OldhamA said:

Helped fund a team being in Charlotte, and now profit from it on a yearly basis. 

There is no home field advantage at Bank of America Stadium because this fairweather, profiteering culture is encouraged. 

Not many of us PSL owners are “profiting” off of our tickets. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OldhamA said:

Helped fund a team being in Charlotte, and now profit from it on a yearly basis. 

There is no home field advantage at Bank of America Stadium because this fairweather, profiteering culture is encouraged. 


when the cowboys or Steelers  come to town:  sure, there is profit to be made  

But have you ever tried to sell a pair of tickets that you paid over 100 dollars for in your psl package to a late season (5-9) panthers team vs a (4-10) falcons team.  I remember seeing tickets being put in the big planter boxes outside the stadium during the 2010 debacle.

There is no home field advantage in Charlotte due to the fact that for 25+ Years, two owners have sold a bag of garbage to the local fan base and tried to pass it as a functioning nfl franchise (sans four or five years). 
 

In order to have a fair weather culture, the team actually needs to appear competent and win some consistently. 
 

 

Edited by bigdog10
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm telling you guys, if we suck, we need to draft Grayson McCall in the 2023 Draft. There is no QB in the draft worth the pick that we hold and there are offensive linemen or even defensive players well worth the pick. Hell, I'd even be fine taking a game breaking receiver. 

Roll with Darnold, if he sucks or the offensive line isn't improved, you get a high draft pick again and you take your QB next year. 

Do not reach for someone who is nearly as old as Darnold but with a power ceiling and a much lower floor.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, AggieLean said:

Sideshow Darnold.

Got his check and got fat?

Honestly, Darnold's biggest problem was that he became the guy they said he was. He held onto that potential through our first three games, then almost did in the fourth and then completely lost it from there (except for almost single-handedly bringing us back and winning the Minnesota game). 

He was the guy who got scared, who got rattled, who saw more ghosts than the Sixth Sense kid. Maybe a Belichick could have fixed him, but our guys couldn't. Now, considering what we've paid for him and the alternatives this year, trot him on out again and get us a high draft position next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

Honestly, Darnold's biggest problem was that he became the guy they said he was. He held onto that potential through our first three games, then almost did in the fourth and then completely lost it from there (except for almost single-handedly bringing us back and winning the Minnesota game). 

He was the guy who got scared, who got rattled, who saw more ghosts than the Sixth Sense kid. Maybe a Belichick could have fixed him, but our guys couldn't. Now, considering what we've paid for him and the alternatives this year, trot him on out again and get us a high draft position next season.

Sam's biggest problem is two parts. He is terrible at playing quarterback and he is not a leader. Yet he continues to get more opportunities that many here would deny other quarterbacks with different backgrounds.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, frankw said:

Sam's biggest problem is two parts. He is terrible at playing quarterback and he is not a leader. Yet he continues to get more opportunities that many here would deny other quarterbacks with different backgrounds.

Yeah, I mean is there anyone who can list something considered a strength that Darnold does? I can't think of any.

He will go down in Panthers history as one of the biggest franchise blunders, if he plays here in 2022 or not.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

Not many of us PSL owners are “profiting” off of our tickets. 

Thank you for saying this 

not many on here realize, too, that it’s nit year by year.   It’s a four, six, 8 year commitment and it doesn’t matter if they suck or not 

the price each year is guaranteed to not go above x percent 

it’s up to the owner to find another PSL buyer if you want out 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2020 Rhule says he's excited to coach Cam and get him healthy LIE

2021 Rhule says Teddy needs to have a tremendous offseason LIE

2022 Rhule says Sam should improve this season LIE

This is the Rhule trend when it comes to QB's he's not hitching his wagon to Sam when he's on one of the hottest seats coming into this season!

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, CMAC22 said:

2020 Rhule says he's excited to coach Cam and get him healthy LIE

2021 Rhule says Teddy needs to have a tremendous offseason LIE

2022 Rhule says Sam should improve this season LIE

This is the Rhule trend when it comes to QB's he's not hitching his wagon to Sam when he's on one of the hottest seats coming into this season!

Yeah, I don't see any chance we are starting Darnold in game 1. They will make a trade or draft a player.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...