Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Apparently the Browns wanted this for Baker.


Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Baker is much more fixable than Darnold.

Although that isn't really saying a lot.

Fixable!?? Lol.. I am not sure about that!! He seams to be set in his ways.. that’s why teams aren’t touching him.. We have to go best player available!! Which I think we will if we can’t trade back.. smokescreens!! We get a qb in trade back.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Browns will need a QB while Whip-It-Out's never-ending legal problems continue to limp along...

...hell, they may as well keep Baker on the roster because the way things are going Mr. W.I.O. could very well miss another entire season 🤦‍♂️

Has there been any confirmation of a formally-executed/legally-binding contract between the Team and Whip It Out?

Interesting that W.I.O. left an organization with 7-winning records and 6-playoff appearances in last 11-seasons...

...for some bumblers with 1-winning record and 1-playoff appearance in the same 11-seasons😬.

Assuming he does get to play again, how long before he starts acting out when things don't go his way?

Edited by SizzleBuzz
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Browns will need a QB while Whip-It-Out's never-ending legal problems continue to limp along...

...hell, they may as well keep Baker on the roster because the way things are going Mr. W.I.O. could very well miss another entire season 🤦‍♂️

Has there been any confirmation of a formally-executed/legally-binding contract between the Team and Whip It Out?

Interesting that W.I.O. left an organization with 7-winning records and 6-playoff appearances in last 11-seasons...

...for some bumblers with 1-winning record and 1-playoff appearance in the same 11-seasons😬.

Assuming he does get to play again, how long before he starts acting out when things don't go his way?

Dude, you gotta give it up or seek help one.

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Snake said:

I wouldn't bet on it. Especially not a first or second round bet. 

Baker is worth a 2nd rounder if they take Darnold. That is pretty much it. And mainly that is getting to dump Darnold.

Outside of that 3rd round is iffy. 4th or later is ideal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...