Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So, who do you like at QB?


MHS831
 Share

Forget trade backs and veteran trades--who would you like to see as the New QB in 2022?  

112 members have voted

  1. 1. Select one:

    • Baker Mayfield
      7
    • Jimmy Garappolo
      8
    • Malik Willis
      31
    • Sam Howell
      12
    • Kenny Pickett
      22
    • Matt Corral
      27
    • Desmond Ridder
      5

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 04/01/2022 at 03:03 AM

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Thompcat said:

The business side says go with Willis because of the upside and if he doesn't show progress with this staff start over next year. If the new staff likes Willis let them develop him. 

The personal side don't do a kid that way with this staff. Don't draft him and him get screwed up by this group. 

This is such a fallacy for so many reasons

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Waldo said:

I would have picked Sam but not an option. It's the QB this staff deserves.

I am not sold on this class of QBs, especially when you match them to our staff and situation. I also don't want to spend on Vets again after the last 2 years. I think Meh is restrained at this point in the 'process'.

I should have included Sam--I was not clear-I should have stated it as the addition of the 3rd QB.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frankw said:

When he's still throwing backbreaking interceptions will you Darnold fans be gone finally? It might be worth it for that.

Its not about being a darnold fan, its about making Rhule fix his mistake and not overdrafting some scrub qb to try and save his job.  Tepper should be like "hell no dough boy, you gave up assets for darnold, said he was talented, now go make it work"

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, thefuzz said:

Would have chosen Sam, if he were an option, as that's what I would prefer to see this season..no more money spent or picks wasted by this coaching staff.

That said, my answer depends on what happens in the draft.  I don't want Jimmy on this team...he just get's us into a position that we may have to keep Rhule, even if we didn't want to...say 9 wins and we miss the playoffs.

If I'm picking at 6, I don't want a rookie.  If we just HAVE TO HAVE ONE in the 1st, please trade back for an additional 2nd.

I'd prefer to sit and take the best OT that's available, and roll with Sam.

I really like Corral and would like him on our team. But part of me feels like Tepper is fed up. He gave Rhule Bridgewater and results sucked. He gave Rhule Darnold….even worse. My gut feeling is that Tepper told Fitt: “If we take another QB and don’t get other premier players…and that Qb sucks then it’s both your asses.” 
 

The good news is I think both Rhule and Fitt are making FOR SURE that if there is a QB other than SD this year then it’s one of two scenarios:

1. A veteran they KNOW is an upgrade - Carr (if his contract falls through) or Murray at this point. This is why they aren’t interested in Baker. 
 

2. A Rookie QB who comes in WITH a BPA option as either a second 1st round pick or a high 2nd round pick. 
 

Idt there is ANY WAY in hell that Fitterer is hitching his wagon to one of these rookies as his only 1st round pick. No way does that happen. It’s professional suicide (with this organization). If the rookie sucks then Tepper is going to be so pissed he’ll fire Rhule and Tepper for risking it all again with a sole pick of a QB. 
 

So….only way the rookie happens imo is if we trade down.    

Edited by unicar15
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Its not about being a darnold fan, its about making Rhule fix his mistake and not overdrafting some scrub qb to try and save his job.  Tepper should be like "hell no dough boy, you gave up assets for darnold, said he was talented, now go make it work"

It should be about what's best for the Panthers not Sam Darnold or Matt Rhule. If it's best for us to send the mole packing even if we have to eat the cap hit then do it. Stop kissing frogs as Florio said.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frankw said:

It should be about what's best for the Panthers not Sam Darnold or Matt Rhule. If it's best for us to send the mole packing even if we have to eat the cap hit then do it. Stop kissing frogs as Florio said.

You are thinking short term, I am thinking long term.  Getting some poo vet in here to win 7-8 games isnt going to do jack poo in the grand scheme of things

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

If that's the case than we wasted a ton of money on decent free agents.  Why sign all these players if we are playing for 2023.  

I imagine the NFL frowns on teams not competing.  The guys on a 1-year (Haynes, Bozeman, Littleton, and Loanidas) are all on pretty cheap deals.  I imagine they can find similar players next year or maybe these guys return. 

We have 6 picks this year and we should have a full complement next year.  We only roster 53 guys so everyone can't be on a 2+ year contract and expect all draftees to make the team.  Keep your homegrown talent and build through the draft means a few 1-year contracts along the way.

I think they believe they can be competitive throughout the year if things come together and CMC plays a full year.  If we are hovering around .500 and in the playoff picture, fans will remain engaged and tuning in.  Hell, we were above .500 last year when CMC played, despite the Darnold and a horrendous offense (scheme and OL).

This roster will not win a superb owl, but hopefully it will compete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, frankw said:

When he's still throwing backbreaking interceptions will you Darnold fans be gone finally? It might be worth it for that.

I don't know him personally ,but I'm pulling for the guy.  He's probably the starting QB for my favorite NFL team.  I guess that makes me a fan?

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, grimesgoat said:

I don't know him personally ,but I'm pulling for the guy.  He's probably the starting QB for my favorite NFL team.  I guess that makes me a fan?

Excuse me sir I am a Panthers fan first. Continuing with the worst starting QB in years (check the stats) to appease his fans is not helpful to my team.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Agreed. A healthy bit from column A (stats) and column B (film) paints the most accurate picture, which is currently that Bryce is not performing up to the standard a 1st round QB (let alone drafted #1 overall) is expected to (statistically). When we dig into the film to see why, we see that while he's having his struggles (not stepping up in the pocket, bailing out early, hesitating on some throws, making occasional bad reads, etc) the team that surrounded him last season was simply awful. Bottom 5 defense, bottom 5 OL, bottom 5 weapons... but somehow one player has to overcome ALL of that in their rookie season? Yeesh... Taking this season into consideration, he started where he left off last season and was rightfully benched. Since starting again, the team has gotten on its first winning streak in a few years and he's made good plays to keep them in the game. Is he lighting it up? Nah... but he is beginning to show the reason so many draftniks had him as QB1a for his class. Re: what the team does next season... who friggin knows anymore at this point T_T. Resign Dalton? Sign Jones? Draft somebody in the mid-to-late rounds? Go with another UFA? Maybe grab an FA that can compete with Bryce for the starting position and draft a rookie to sit and develop? Might be best of both worlds for the team, but ugh... not a fun position to still be in with question marks throughout the position group.
    • Yeah, this is basically the same as asking, "What if Bryce Young suddenly had Patrick Mahomes brain, how would he do?" It isn't happening. This ship is beyond sailed. Send him somewhere else, let us move on and him move on. 
    • Dalton is too close to starting right now. If it hadn't been for a car accident, he still would be. Switching Dalton for Jones does nothing except reduce the backup's age by a decade. One is in his NFL prime, the other is almost in his NFL grave. Not a horrible move if you're trying to improve the team. We've got to get better as a team and a lateral move like that would improve the team. The problem isn't that he's close to starting. The problem is we have a GM that signed off on BY and didn't bring in any serious QB competition for camp, a HC that said yeah, he's my guy until BY poo the bed so bad he couldn't start him, and an offense that's limited because BY can't make all the throws a normal NFL QB can.  The problem isn't that Jones could be an improvement as a backup QB. The problem is he could be better than our "franchise" QB. 
×
×
  • Create New...