Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Giants open to trade


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

This definitely makes sense for the Giants though if they're sticking with Jones. The Panthers are showing every signs of taking a QB at #6 so everyone later in the draft knows they probably have to leapfrog us to have their pick of the QBs. That makes #5 pretty appealing. I could definitely see a team like the Falcons jumping on that.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, t96 said:

And they would hang up immediately and never do business with you again.

6 overall and a 2023 1st rounder is not even close in value to 5 and 7 overall this year. And no Robby Anderson being added would not move the needle whatsoever either.

Know how I know you didn't read the report?

The Giants have multiple reasons for doing this, including financial considerations.

Plus I kind of doubt that Joe Schoen is gonna just hang up on an old friend like Dan Morgan and tell him to never call again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Honestly, I agree with that. I think it's just a pretty typical QB class that everyone perceives as weak because it comes the year after a perceived extremely strong QB class.

The possibility that other teams might jump on the offer and trade ahead of us is an additional reason for us to look into it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, t96 said:

And they would hang up immediately and never do business with you again.

 

6 overall and a 2023 1st rounder is not even close in value to 5 and 7 overall this year. And no Robbie Anderson being added would not move the needle whatsoever either.

Fitzgerald-Spielberger NFL Draft Trade Value Chart (caveat: not every team uses the same chart. Example for illustrations purposes only with a publicly available chart)

#6 = 2092, #5 = 2184, # 7= 2014

Difference is 2,106 which is between the #5 and #6. Future picks are valued by each team a little differently. I've read where some teams give half point value at the middle of the first round. Yeah, it's going to take ALOT more than #6 (edit: and next year's 1st rounder) to get #5 and #7.

Edited by trueblade
punctuation
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, trueblade said:

Fitzgerald-Spielberger NFL Draft Trade Value Chart (caveat: not every team uses the same chart. Example for illustrations purposes only with a publicly available chart)

#6 = 2092, #5 = 2184, # 7= 2014

Difference is 2,106 which is between the #5 and #6. Future picks are valued by each team a little differently. I've read where some teams give half point value at the middle of the first round. Yeah, it's going to take ALOT more than #6 to get #5 and #7

Some teams don't use that kind of chart at all, but you can negotiate the package.

And again, I think negotiations being between two friends and former colleagues does make a difference.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Honestly, I agree with that. I think it's just a pretty typical QB class that everyone perceives as weak because it comes the year after a perceived extremely strong QB class.

I wish Howells pro day wasn’t closer to the others. 
Really want him to do well. Hope the Panthers are there in force but I have a feeling that they won’t be. Unless being close by makes a difference. 
Seems like everyone has forgotten him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Know how I know you didn't read the report?

The Giants have multiple reasons for doing this, including financial considerations.

Plus I kind of doubt that Joe Schoen is gonna just hang up on an old friend like Dan Morgan and tell him to never call again.

But specifically that trade. #6 and next year's 1st for #5 and #7? That ain't gonna happen. Future draft picks are generally valued as the last pick in the round so next year's 1st has roughly the same value as the #32 overall pick in this year's draft. You definitely couldn't get #5 and #7 for #6 and #32.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

But specifically that trade. #6 and next year's 1st for #5 and #7? That ain't gonna happen. Future draft picks are generally valued as the last pick in the round so next year's 1st has roughly the same value as the #32 overall pick in this year's draft. You definitely couldn't get #5 and #7 for #6 and #32.

See above.

Plus throw in that the Giants are wanting that next year's pick for a reason.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The report says they're open to trading either of this year's firsts for a first next year. I'm just suggesting an add-on.

I'd also suggest having Dan Morgan be the one that makes the call.

Lol tells you all you need to know how poo this draft is compared to next years

 

14 minutes ago, t96 said:

And they would hang up immediately and never do business with you again.

 

6 overall and a 2023 1st rounder is not even close in value to 5 and 7 overall this year. And no Robby Anderson being added would not move the needle whatsoever either.

Yea probably have to throw it a second, but I’d remember 1 a pick in next draft is worth more just because of the class and 2 it’s the panthers who will have a low graded rookie or Darnold - I’d place a bet right now that pick will easily be in the top half of the draft

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It amuses me how Goff's name the last few years is often used to compare to subpar or underperforming QB's. Now on the surface I get it. But when you look at his numbers he's been the same QB all along. He's improved his completion % but even with the Rams he averaged 63.4. And that Super Bowl he played in they should have won honestly. If we can get a QB as good as Goff I'll be pretty damn pleased.
    • And it remains to be seen if Goff has that ability or not. Plenty of very good QB's like Goff were not able to get over those playoff humps. Matt Ryan, Kirk Cousins, etc. You can still be an upper tier QB and never get over that hurdle. McVay just thought(and hasn't been wrong yet) Goff was never going to be that guy.
    • You literally simply have to think logically for either of those guys. Smith is locked up on a deal for 2025, so we would have to trade for him or he gets cut. Neither of those scenarios are likely in the first place.  Wilson will be 37 in 2025. Why on earth would he have any interest in a situation that is far worse than he was given in Denver and wasn't able to win there? He's a guy that can drop into any ready to win franchise in the NFL and immediately elevate their chances of winning(provided they already have QB issues).  Frankly, that is either speculation that even David Newton should be embarrassed by or it shows how disconnected with reality some people in our organization are.   I do agree with him on getting a veteran QB, however. That's our best chance to keep developing our talent.
×
×
  • Create New...