The truth about Baker and Jimmy G

[PootieNunu]

7 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

The niners may not think trey lance  is ready yet. It was reported today that the 49ers might actually keep Jimmy for his last year of his contract 

They let stuff like that leak to drive the trade value up, it's bullshit. 

They want to trade him without looking like they want to trade him

[NJPanthers89]

9 hours ago, The Lobo said:

The niners were injury plagued two years ago so when Jimmy was out so were their other best players. I believe it was the same way in 2018 as well so their w-l record without him should include some context. He’s not horrible, but he does need a great supporting case to get him to the next level. You could argue they win in spite of him and to me he’s not worth trading assets for or even signing for one year. Same goes for Baker, Dude had a great supporting cast the last couple of years and just could never get it done. 

The point is you likely won't have to trade any assets for either of them as both the 49ers and Browns have no leverage in trade talks.  The NFC is wide open compared to the AFC.  Jimmy G could easily lead this Panthers team to the playoffs...

[MHS831]

Interesting--and that could mean that the Panthers saying they are not interested in Baker is simply because Cleveland was asking for a high pick.  Or they aren't interested in Baker. 
Jimmy, coming off shoulder surgery is problematic.  He will not be throwing (if all goes well) meaningful passes until July or August.

The panthers are looking at QB, but man their obvious appearances and antics at these pro days are either brilliant smokescreens or they reveal that they have made a decision to draft a QB

[thefuzz]

Neither can win consistently without a talented roster.

Mid level starting QB's that cost too much.  Unfortunately, we have a bottom tier QB that we are paying the same amount as Baker.

No thank you, dance with Sam.