Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers closing in on Duane Brown

Jmac

By Jmac,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted (edited)
40 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

 

I think it's just to keep their options open.  If we come out the other side of FA with no LT options, we almost have to draft one, even a the risk of reaching if the big three are gone.  I get we have BC and Erving, but the first is a project and the later is a placeholder.  Neither are the answer for franchise LT.  If Brown comes here it would be a 3-year deal MAX and likely structured for two years of actual service.  We'd be looking for his successor next draft season anyway. 

In short, signing Brown in no way takes us out of the LT sweepstakes this draft.

Edited by 45catfan
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Erving agreed but you have no idea BC ceiling because we haven't given him a chance.  He's extremely athletic and could be but no one knows until you give him some seasoning.  

So you are willing to pass up a top 5 LT prospect because you don't feel BC got a fair shake?  I'm not sure I follow that train of thought.  That's definitely not how you run successful a draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
trueblade Grand Master

trueblade

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

So you are willing to pass up a top 5 LT prospect because you don't feel BC got a fair shake?  I'm not sure I follow that train of thought.  That's definitely not how you run successful a draft.

Passed on at least two QBs last draft because they were convinced they had something in Darnold

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DaveThePanther2008 Grand Master

DaveThePanther2008

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

So you are willing to pass up a top 5 LT prospect because you don't feel BC got a fair shake?  I'm not sure I follow that train of thought.  That's definitely not how you run successful a draft.

You build through the draft.  You bring players in and let them develop.  You don't continually add the same piece because the rookie didn't make the Pro Bowl.  

Remember us drafting CB after CB and so many other positions fell through.

We are working on Brown and BC can learn behind him or play guard but he should be viewed as part of our future.

I'd rather take a QB than Another LT.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, trueblade said:

Passed on at least two QBs last draft because they were convinced they had something in Darnold

Doubling down on stupid doesn't make it better.  I can't see how drafting a QB next month makes this team any better.  I know what they are hoping for; sit the rookie this year and start next season after Darnold departs.  One problem, that's assuming the rookie amounts to something.  I don't think they will.  Not this year's crop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

You build through the draft.  You bring players in and let them develop.  You don't continually add the same piece because the rookie didn't make the Pro Bowl.  

Remember us drafting CB after CB and so many other positions fell through.

We are working on Brown and BC can learn behind him or play guard but he should be viewed as part of our future.

I'd rather take a QB than Another LT.  

You draft until the answer is found and you also draft BPA in round 1.  Both are truisms. If they feel Pickett or Willis is somehow better than Ekwonu, Neal or Cross, then so be it.  However, most BBs I've seen (outside of Cross in some instances) don't have them stacked like that.  So you are breaking cardinal rule #1 and committing cardinal sin #1, don't reach out of desperation.

Running the draft off emotion never ends well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DaveThePanther2008 Grand Master

DaveThePanther2008

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

You draft until the answer is found and you also draft BPA in round 1.  Both are truisms. If they feel Pickett or Willis is somehow better than Ekwonu, Neal or Cross, then so be it.  However, most BBs I've seen (outside of Cross in some instances) don't have them stacked like that.  So you are breaking cardinal rule #1 and committing cardinal sin #1, don't reach out of desperation.

Running the draft off emotion never ends well.

You should follow your own advice.  You want a LT because you feel BC isn't good enough.  That's pure emotion because we really didn't give BC a chance.  We drafted a LT last year. Brady Christensen and when given the chance (last couple of games) he played well for a rookie.  I believe James Campen is going to get him even better. 

We have other needs that could be filled outside of QB and LT that would warrant a #6 pick.   

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Growl Veteran

Growl

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, 45catfan said:

I think it's just to keep their options open.  If we come out the other side of FA with no LT options, we almost have to draft one, even a the risk of reaching if the big three are gone.  I get we have BC and Erving, but the first is a project and the later is a placeholder.  Neither are the answer for franchise LT.  If Brown comes here it would be a 3-year deal MAX and likely structured for two years of actual service.  We'd be looking for his successor next draft season anyway. 

In short, signing Brown in no way takes us out of the LT sweepstakes this draft.

spacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

You should follow your own advice.  You want a LT because you feel BC isn't good enough.  That's pure emotion because we really didn't give BC a chance.  We drafted a LT last year. Brady Christensen and when given the chance (last couple of games) he played well for a rookie.  I believe James Campen is going to get him even better. 

We have other needs that could be filled outside of QB and LT that would warrant a #6 pick.   

I am.  Neal, Ekwonu and Cross are stacked #3, #4 and #5 overall on my favorite BB.  So unless Hutchinson or Walker falls to #6, all those dudes are ranked WELL ahead of either Willis or Pickett.  Also, you don't hang your hat on a 3rd round guy when a better prospect is there for the taking.  Willis is #14 and Pickett is #30 on that site.  But hey, we need a QB.  For all of Marty Hurney's faults...and there was a ton of them, he stuck to this philosophy regarding first round picks and never missed. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gofightwin Community Regular

gofightwin

Posted
Posted

Fine if they are planning to slide BC inside for another year to hit the weight room. Otherwise another kick of the can and we are looking for our LT of the future, again, next year. 
 

Every year we sign an aging or crap LT and hope it works. Besides part of a season with Oher, it hasn’t worked. At all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      Gameday Thread: KC-CAR

      By strato · Posted

      He made some excellent throws but he always has made some excellent throws here and there. I don't know what to think, which is what I was apprehensive about. Is he going to have a decent downfield game? Because okay Legette dropped one, but someone was giving stats prior to the bye or during it where he had two downfield completions and one of them was the jump ball that is just launched and fingers are crossed that our guy comes down with it, and yesterday we saw that again. The Russell Wilson school of downfield passing.  I don't feel like that is sustainable, but at the same time you have to do Something to make the defense understand they have to defend that downfield throws. Like i said, confused.  I guess I'm going to review the game for myself and look closely at his mechanics and stuff because if he actually fixed that stuff it explains the better throws. And that has been my biggest objection, or what I see as the thing that makes or breaks his chances, that unorthodox dropback and tippy toe action and not having his feet set which limits velocity etc etc. 
    • Manna
      Crazy stat

      By Manna · Posted

      The negative Nancy in me (or objective?) says that they had a bye week to prepare for the Chiefs. However, it’s one thing to have a good plan and it’s another to actually execute it. For all the flack he’s received (from me as well), Bryce seemingly has put his head down and worked his tail off and his play is giving me hope. The first 18-game Bryce showed no progression whatsoever. He gets benched, comes back, and has shown steady progress every week he has started. I think I’m starting to see what the Bryce lovers and unconditional defenders were saying all along, and I hope he can show that on a regular basis for the sake of our QB1 position. 
    • Bear Hands
      Some Thoughts on Our Remaining Games

      By Bear Hands · Posted

      Yeah, we could still very well end up 4-13 with the 2nd pick.   I think LVR has the inside track for 1, with only a JAX team as a team on docket that could be beatable.    
×
×
  • Create New...