Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Watson to Cleveland


Toker Smurf
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Actually, Josina Anderson confirmed that we were ruled out the same time they were. It just wasn't reported at the time.

And then they got ruled back in.

I think this entire episode shows you cannot trust a damn person who claims they have "sources".  We were told by someone on here that their source said Seattle was the lead team in the beginning 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Actually, Josina Anderson confirmed that we were ruled out the same time they were. It just wasn't reported at the time.

And then they got ruled back in.

My point is we were never actually ruled out just like the Browns weren’t. All those reports were nonsense. It all came down to who would pay him the most and we weren’t going to, which is the right decision.

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, t96 said:

My point is we were never actually ruled out just like the Browns weren’t. All those reports were nonsense. It all came down to who would pay him the most and we weren’t going to, which is the right decision.

I wonder if the call came to Tepper, "Watson will change his mind if you can guarantee $240 Million"

 

Tepper: "fug you and the fuging horse you rode in on"

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, t96 said:

My point is we were never actually ruled out just like the Browns weren’t. All those reports were nonsense. It all came down to who would pay him the most and we weren’t going to, which is the right decision.

Given that he didn't wave his no trade clause for us and he's not coming here, I think it's pretty safe to say we were ruled out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Shocker said:

I've read all those stories about sources and the trade not being final.

Everyone but the Texans and Browns.

The reports are that the Texans and Browns still must execute the trade. Not hearing anything from the Texans or the Browns.

This is all coming from Watson?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...