Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Watson Thread - Part Deux


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, CRA said:

Maybe from Houston's perspective. 

Hard to argue we got the best offer to  Watson.  We have a lameduck coach and haven't won more than 5 games for 3 straight seasons (that's our offer). 

The fact that we have a “lame duck” coach might actually be a plus. I feel that it has been conveyed to Watson that he would be involved in coaching hires, what Houston supposedly offered him and reneged on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, amcoolio said:

Most of you have the patience of a 2 year old, you might just want to step away from the internet, jesus christ

I think you are being generous.

I'd love to play poker with some of these folks.  Looking to fold before the cards are even dealt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Allbright just said on Twitter live space thingy that he’ll donate 10k not 1k to a Cleveland charity if he goes to Cleveland 

Allbright said Watson ruled out all cold weather teams and said no to Denver

Said he still believes Carolina or New Orleans And still has New Orleans out front 

Sh*t, I don’t blame him on that lol

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, joemac said:

LOL I get you hate the guy, but Rhule is far from the worst coach in NFL history.  fuging Hue Jackson went 0-32 or some poo like that. Calm down. 

When considering the damage Rhule has done -- and continues to do -- to the franchise, then no, it is not a stretch to rank him with Hue Jackson. Jackson's best season far exceeds anything Rhule has or ever will accomplish.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trying to help those 3 folks who hate this move.    In 2025 2.75 million is basically the new "vet" minimum.    They still need #3 RB and returner, draft could/should be the lane for that.    There's no downside to this move, they could cut with little effect and replace with your chosen rookie.   
    • Is it though? Even looking at just this past year, DK played 3 more games and had 81 more yards than Higgins had, but he also did it on less catches, with DK averaging 15 yards per catch and Higgins with 12.5. Yes, Higgins had 10 TDs to DK's 5, but I'd say that was far less about the WRs than the QBs, seeing as Burrow had 43 TDs (and only 9 INTs) to Geno's 21 TDs (and 15 INTs).  Swap the two of them last year and DK puts up better stats with Burrow as his QB than Higgins did, no doubt about it in my mind. DK has also only missed 3 games in his career, Higgins has missed 5 in each of the last 2 seasons. People here complain about our WR speed (and it's many people's biggest issue with T-Mac in the draft), but Higgins ran a 4.59 40 and DK ran a 4.33. DK has only played one more season than Higgins but he has 1,730 yards and 14 TDs more than Higgins, despite playing with the ghost of Russell Wilson and Geno Smith, while Higgins has had Burrow. To me, there is no debate, DK is a significantly better WR than Higgins.  Give him Burrow as his QB during his career and his numbers would dwarf what Higgins has put up.
    • Thanks to @CarolinaLivin for the Juan-like work!  
×
×
  • Create New...