Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No more Watson threads. Use this one or one of the other 20 existing ones.


rayzor
 Share

Recommended Posts

Good hopefully the Taints get him. Why mortgage the future and give up so much of a ransom for a guy who hasn't even played in a year and wasn't THE ABSOLUTE TOP QB in the league when he played last. He was good but he isn't worth what the Texans are asking. New Orleans probably has much better happy ending massage parlors anyhow so they win regardless. Roll with Cam another season and get some lineman to protect him while setting the stage to DRAFT a QB and develop him but of course our inept coaching staff can't develop players anyhow so let's let Rhule work his way out of this job and give the new coach first round picks to work with.

Edited by YourLastThought
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Shocker said:

LOL…leave out the players going out and his enormous cap hit and him costing many more premium picks than a move up would cost.  Not to mention the 22 pending civil suits.  Lets ignore all that

 

Do you think there are any two guys on the defense right now that significantly change the fortunes of the franchise to lose them? I think there are lots of good young players. There are no Von Millers or Aaron Donalds. 

Depends on where the Panthers are picking, but let's say they are picking 10th without Watson in 2022 and need to move up, to, say, 2nd overall. We have a blueprint for that trade from last year with the 49ers, who traded from 12th to 3rd. They gave up 12, two future firsts, and a current third. That's almost exactly the pick compensation being discussed for Watson.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

Or perhaps they know Houston would never trade him within the division? 

use your brain

I am dude. It won't happen BUT the whole idea of "I don't want to face player-x in our division" in any trade is S-T-U-P-I-D, especially if said team gets the best offer.

Edited by 45catfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Smittymoose said:

Do you think there are any two guys on the defense right now that significantly change the fortunes of the franchise to lose them? I think there are lots of good young players. There are no Von Millers or Aaron Donalds. 

Depends on where the Panthers are picking, but let's say they are picking 10th without Watson in 2022 and need to move up, to, say, 2nd overall. We have a blueprint for that trade from last year with the 49ers, who traded from 12th to 3rd. They gave up 12, two future firsts, and a current third. That's almost exactly the pick compensation being discussed for Watson.

I don’t want Watson at that price…you do.  Thats fine everyone has their opinions here

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Technically we don’t but standing pat for now at QB doesn’t sound like Tepper at this point 

If we were smart, we would admit what we did in the past was stupid, save our draft capital, build the line through the draft, run it back with Darnold grab a rookie QB that you like in the draft in the top 5 (or higher).

 

But no man, we are going to be rolling with watson trying to figure out how to get him line help while our defense is bottom 3rd in the NFL.   All the while being perpetually up against the cap

Edited by mrcompletely11
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

You're taking this way too personally.

Yeah it's like if you can't even handle difference of opinion on this matter how exactly are you going to make it through what is likely another season of disappointment? Even with Watson we aren't just going on a magical Super Bowl run right away. Matt Rhule is not going to just go from outcoached by every head coach that was fired to Jimmy Johnson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

If they actually accept the type of ransom being thrown out there while no other team does?  Players end up facing their old teams all the time.  I think the whole "we don't want to face him" thing is WAY overblown by any traded player.  It projects weakness and distrust within you own four walls that you can't overcome playing against one of your former players.

Then how about the simple fact that it would make Indy a likely SB contender. And those 1st-2nd rounders are at the bottom of the rounds. Not possible top 10 picks. Huge difference in value right off the top. And teams don’t trade good QBs to division opponents. That is a very valid reason as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

If he goes to the Saints, fug him. 

I'm saying that now, especially if he comes here.  I guess I will take a pause from the Panthers until he is traded later on, Rhule gets fired or Tepper sales the team.  I didn't think we'd ever become the freaking Jets, Browns and Bengals of old, but this team is turning into the armpit of the NFL.

Edited by 45catfan
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...