Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No more Watson threads. Use this one or one of the other 20 existing ones.

rayzor

By rayzor,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

NCTHFL0567 Experienced

NCTHFL0567

Posted
Posted
Just now, WOW!! said:

How are they ready to win?? 

They are the worst team in that division.. That Division has 3 defenses better then theirs and 2 younger QB..

Oh and the Super bowl champions prime for another run..

And our Division has no QB's worth a damn right now other than a 37 year old Matty Water. Yeah.............

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tbe Grand Master

Tbe

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

If Deshaun wants to win, Seattle is the choice. 

They've already got additional picks from trading Wilson.

Seattle is an organization w/proven management and coaches that have an extensive record of winning.  

Or chose the Panthers. 

A highly dysfunctional organization with a four year losing streak.  Panthers management were recently described as "a poo show" by an NFL executive.  The team already has a deficit of picks for 2022 and is willing to give away what little talent they possess (leaving the teams cupboards bare for years to come).

If Deshaun's primary concern is winning, he'll choose Seattle.  If Deshaun's primary concern is power and control (over a poo show) he'll choose Carolina.

 

You make the call D. Watson


Pete Carrol will most likely retire next year. Seattle is not a sure thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthercougar68 Grand Master

Panthercougar68

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

How are they ready to win?? 

They are the worst team in that division.. That Division has 3 defenses better then theirs and 2 younger QB..

Oh and the Super bowl champions prime for another run..

Seattle has picks that’s about it. People on here have knocked Fitterer from coming from a “horrible roster” in Seattle  then turn around and say Seattle has a decent roster.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted

We should really make a thread looking at these teams and what they have to give up..

That will not only satisfy Deshaun but Houston as well..

We know what we have to give up but others teams will have to beat our Picks + young players as well as end up with a good situation for Deshaun to win in..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NanuqoftheNorth Grand Master

NanuqoftheNorth

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, NCTHFL0567 said:

Seattle won 7 games this past year. Has arguably a worst roster, and just traded two of the players that helped the most to get those 7 wins. Sorry man. I don't see how you think this. Seattle hasn't won anything of significance since the early 2010's. 

Seattle's management/coaching staff has produced a 9 year winning streak over the last decade.

Carolina?

Matt Rhule hasn't even figured out how to stop the run, score in the third quarter or produce a winning season, much less back-to-back winning seasons.

Tepper and Rhule are rank amateurs compared to Seattle when it comes to managing an NFL franchise. 

That should be a matter of significant concern for any franchise QB contemplating his next move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • LinvilleGorge
      2024 College Football Thread

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...