Read this, give me your thoughts.

[Evil Hurney]

Seems like a lawyer doing their job (assuming this is from the defense). Casting doubt on the motives of the whole by highlighting a few.

Overall, there's probably a mix of $$$ chasers and actual victims, but they get lumped in together.

 

[PhillyB]

24 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Ok? I think the concern is more trying to force sex to someone who isn’t expecting it and not willing to do it. If he paid for it and both parties were ok with it from the beginning than yeah I don’t most people having a problem with that. 

he was exonerated of that in a court of law

[CBDellinger]

Not surprised at all.

[Cam's New Arm]

Hmmm. Color me shocked. Instagram thots doing thot things. Whoda thunk.

[ForJimmy]

6 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

he was exonerated of that in a court of law

I get that. OJ was innocent in the court of law, Big Ben was never found guilty, nor was Ray Lewis. Watson’s case is a “he said, she said” case. You can’t convict people on those. There is still a civil case and that’s a lot of women for it to be a set up. There are text messages of him apologizing to one of them, so there is some smoke there as well. Maybe he thought he was paying for something else? Maybe not? It was enough of an issue for him not to get traded or play last year and still might get suspended multiple games for conduct. 

[DaveThePanther2008]

8 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

he was exonerated of that in a court of law

Exactly, people need to stop saying he's guilty.  They couldn't indict him on these charges now the only thing left is civilly. 

I believe the civil suits are going to be settled.   Those women are going to have their lives turned inside and out.  Once they find, they have a very resourceful investigation team, one former customer that had sex with them their suit goes into the toilet.  

IMO they'll take the money offered and move on. 

[DaveThePanther2008]

16 minutes ago, Evil Hurney said:

Seems like a lawyer doing their job (assuming this is from the defense). Casting doubt on the motives of the whole by highlighting a few.

Overall, there's probably a mix of $$$ chasers and actual victims, but they get lumped in together.

 

Actual victims, even one, would have been enough evidence to force a criminal trial. 

IMO....More Money Grabbers

[uncfan888]

3 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I get that. OJ was innocent in the court of law, Big Ben was never found guilty, nor was Ray Lewis. Watson’s case is a “he said, she said” case. You can’t convict people on those. There is still a civil case and that’s a lot of women for it to be a set up. There are text messages of him apologizing to one of them, so there is some smoke there as well. Maybe he thought he was paying for something else? Maybe not? It was enough of an issue for him not to get traded or play last year and still might get suspended multiple games for conduct. 

You are making an awful lot of assumptions. Especially with your first post saying he forced himself onto people that didn't want that

[*FreeFua*]

I’m shocked.

This never happens

[cookinbrak]

Given that the plaintiffs names are being displayed for the general public, and it's all based on "sources", this is either fake or illegal.

[Zod]

Entire document. 

https://i.iheart.com/v3/re/new_assets/607da30a4c74cd0be9fdd795?passthrough=1

[Mike in Raleigh]

If he hadn't been a damn perv, forcing himself on women, there wouldn't be anything for them to go after him for. Just because some saw an opportunity to cash in doesn't excuse his behavior. 

[mrcompletely11]

1 minute ago, Zod said:

Entire document. 

https://i.iheart.com/v3/re/new_assets/607da30a4c74cd0be9fdd795?passthrough=1

thank you

[Zod]

Just now, Mike in Raleigh said:

If he hadn't been a damn perv, forcing himself on women, there wouldn't be anything for them to go after him for. Just because some saw an opportunity to cash in doesn't excuse his behavior. 

IF it was consensual would you have a problem with it? Because it probably was.