Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rumor. Jimmy G potentially to Saints. Steelers also making a push


 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, hepcat said:

Jimmy G might actually be decent in New Orleans I mean they managed to win some games with Trevor Semen 

Remember when Siemian was Broncos Starting Qb after Peyton Manning left and they acted like he was going to be great? I mean he was an okay QB but not great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, stbugs said:

It’s also the prospects. This class pales in comparison to last year’s class. SF had no issue trading 3 firsts to get the 3rd QB and Chicago traded a 1st to move up for QB4. Anyone going to give up a pick to move up and get QB1 this year?

We as we’ve done since Hurney 2.0 came back, misjudge the strengths and weaknesses of upcoming drafts. Last year was a much better year to take a QB and we messed up in several ways (not tanking and trading for Darnold) and now it looks like we’ll ignore a great tackle class again and reach for a QB that probably goes 2nd round last year and may not even be as good as Mills a 3rd rounder last year.

Yeah, Justin Fields or Mac Jones would probably be a slam dunk #1 pick this year. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

Its not a matter of the prospects available in the draft, its what it costs to move up to grab a QB prospect

Dude, I thank the football gods weekly that you take the time to post here. Now I thank you for making sense and trying to patiently, put things into a reasonable perspective and take down the hyperbole that is unfortunately so common place. You're my fav poster hands down. Keep Pounding Casillas!!! 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

1 hour ago, stbugs said:

SF had no issue trading 3 firsts to get the 3rd QB and Chicago traded a 1st to move up for QB4. Anyone going to give up a pick to move up and get QB1 this year?

True but how did that work out for them? It's early it's true but the first couldn't beat out an injured Garrapolo and the second was worse than Dalton. Maybe they will be great but so far they haven't exactly proven the "experts" to be so great at judging QBs but better suited at hyping stories and players for clicks. I don't really see it as proof that no QB in this class will be good or not. The QB who had the best season was supposed to be the one who wasn't really an NFL caliber QB to many. Heck, the Texans drafted the QB with the second best season from last year's class in the 3rd round I believe.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, joemac said:

We’re gonna end up with Jameis Winston at this point. Not that that is necessarily a terrible thing, but….damn. 

Gardner Minshew would be better. We should just trade Robbie’s ass straight up for him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don’t see it happening, especially not for the ridiculous price they will likely want for his services. Not that I want it to anyway, with all the weapons he has there and he still couldn’t pull it off. 

I’d rather continue rolling with Winston who was on pace for a 34-7 TD-INT ratio before going down, and that was with a makeshift WR room consisting mostly of undrafted free agents. At least this year he should have Thomas to throw to for a few games. 😂

 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm still not touching Hunter He again said the other day that he plans on playing both sides of the ball in the NFL.  If he is allowed to do that, he won't be as good on either side as his potential and he's going to have serious injury issues and have a short career.  If he's not allowed to do it, I think he's going to become a problem when the team isn't winning as he's going to feel him not being used on both sides of the ball is why. He's being coddled in that environment with Deion and I think it's doing a disservice to him to prepare him for life in the NFL where your coach isn't a 2nd father to you, to where you can just walk into his locker room and steal his shoes like Hunter does to Deion.
    • He’s a tad behind them. Around 15ish of 32 starters in the league. He’s well ahead of a lot of guys. Tua, Bryce, Cousins (present), Rodgers (current), Devito/Jones, Minshew, Russ (current), Watson, Smith, Carr, T Laws deep ball is weak as poo IMO, there’s plenty. And it’s not like everyone is ripping 60+ers. The key component is if you can rip and maintain velocity of the 30-40 yarders which he does super well. Legit every report out there from Brugler to PFF to PFN document him as good/above average arm strength.  Eye test tells me it’s pretty much that as well, slightly above average.
    • 6-10 carries for  35-45 yds and 3-5 catches for 15-25 would be great. 
×
×
  • Create New...