Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Panthers have received trade calls for Christian McCaffrey


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Shocker said:

I disagree completely.  CMC was our offense a fews years back when healthy.  He is 25 and not currently injured.  Everyone has completely written us off but we do have talent on this roster.  We won’t be doing a fire sell anytime soon and anyone who thinks we are doesn’t get the situation 

I don’t think we WILL but I can’t say I think we shouldn’t. We are once again cap strapped, with no offensive line, losing Reddick, no QB and likely a new coaching staff coming in next season.

CMC hasn’t stayed healthy in two years and thinking he can be our offense again for a whole season sees based more on optimism than in reality. I respect your opinion so I won’t say “you don’t get the situation” but I certainly disagree with your position here. I just don’t see it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheMostInterestingMan said:

I don’t think we WILL but I can’t say I think we shouldn’t. We are once again cap strapped, with no offensive line, losing Reddick, no QB and likely a new coaching staff coming in next season.

CMC hasn’t stayed healthy in two years and thinking he can be our offense again for a whole season sees based more on optimism than in reality. I respect your opinion so I won’t say “you don’t get the situation” but I certainly disagree with your position here. I just don’t see it.

Fine we disagree 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, joemac said:

Of course we could be in the playoffs in 3 years.  We will likely have 90% different players in 3 years than what we have now. 3 years in an eternity in the NFL.  

Tell that to the Browns, Lions, Jags, Jets, Bills (pre current regime) Dolphins, Raiders… do I hope you are right? Of course. But I think the Bengals overnight success has everyone forgetting that some teams take decades to get back there. Especially those with incompetent owners/front offices

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

Who is "ya'll" and who here is still actively backing Tepper and Rhule? Lol 

We all agree that this team has been run terribly since Tepper stepped in. But holding on to CMC just to miss the playoffs for the next three years seems kind of silly when we could start adding assets for a rebuild that essentially has to happen before we can have success again. I don't want Rhule drafting a QB. I don't want Rhule here at all. But I did say when he came in it was time to tear it al down and rebuild. We didn't. We thought we could "win now" and that is EXACTLY why we are still in the same position we were when he got here. 

We need to break this thing up and finally start over. And adding 1sts and making cap space is a good start towards that. 

Adding assets is smart, in theory. Adding assets when Rhule is running the team is retarded. 

"Y'all" in this case was directed toward any season-ticket or PSL holder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Carl Spackler said:

Adding assets is smart, in theory. Adding assets when Rhule is running the team is retarded. 

"Y'all" in this case was directed toward any season-ticket or PSL holder.

I agree with that for sure. If we could add a 2023 1st I would like it even more. I don’t want Rhule fingerprints on this team anymore than they already are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

I agree with that for sure. If we could add a 2023 1st I would like it even more. I don’t want Rhule fingerprints on this team anymore than they already are.

It comes down to this: if Rhule weren't running the team I'd understand it a bit. But if Rhule weren't running the team, there would be no need for it.

So it's just retarded, like everything else this shitwreck does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Cam Lawter said:

Trading our franchise player for a 1st round pick that has a chance to be a franchise player seems dumb to me. Mcafferey has put our team on his back while he's played here and there's not another NFL player that makes defenses scheme around him as much as him. 

Which hasn’t been very often 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Carl Spackler said:

It comes down to this: if Rhule weren't running the team I'd understand it a bit. But if Rhule weren't running the team, there would be no need for it.

So it's just retarded, like everything else this shitwreck does.

I’m just of the mindset Rhule won’t be here after this year. So if we can grab a future first then I’m very on board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

I’m just of the mindset Rhule won’t be here after this year. So if we can grab a future first then I’m very on board.

That's thinking with your heart and not your head. I don't think Rhule gets less than 5 years, even if he enters 2023 on a 24-game losing streak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Cam Lawter said:

Trading our franchise player for a 1st round pick that has a chance to be a franchise player seems dumb to me. Mcafferey has put our team on his back while he's played here and there's not another NFL player that makes defenses scheme around him as much as him.  We will be begging for him back when you see all we have in the backfield is Chuba and Darnold 

If your "franchise player" is a RB in today's NFL then your team sucks.

The Titans are the high water mark of how far a RB led team can go and they still have a pretty decent QB and a great D.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Did I mention that he was on worse teams?  Yes.  Do QBs alone win games?  No.  Did Cam, on a much better team with some awesome defenses ever have 2 consecutive winning seasons?  No.  So now you are cherry picking,  If the overall stats are similar, you take a look at him.   I told you that you look at his skill set---but you wanted to tell me that he sucks and mentioned performance.  I just presented performance--and his numbers are very similar to Cam Newton's numbers--a player most call the best Panther QB ever--and I agree.  By the way, Fumbles are evidence of how bad his OL has been--so you are saying that a QB in a situation worse than Cam's who has stats and physical abilities very similar to Cam's should not be given a look when you have Bryce Young at QB?  You are going with that story because you simply talked your way into a corner and now you are trying to save face.  No good GM would do what you suggest because "he sucks."  Sorry, but the facts do not support you.  But no matter what eye-opening details I provide, there are some who are going to go their Google machines to try to find some reason to support an ignorant approach to developing the QB position.  You ignored the similarities to Cam and went cherry picking.  I know what you are doing--but I am only suggesting (as I have stated before) that we bring him in as one of three approaches to resolving the QB issue. Compete with Bryce and draft a QB. Basically, I am suggesting that Jones has the potential to replace Dalton and compete with Young.  He is a battered stock that could get better in a better situation--that is human nature.  Instead, I am called a Daniel Jones lover and superfan.  That is good debate--But a real sign of immature thinking is the inability to LOGICALLY consider alternative perspectives--which is actually a characteristic of intelligence.   
    • I don’t get this, I know that is the popular thought process but I just don’t think it’s true.  For instance head to head last year the ACC had a winning record against the SEC.  The SEC had a losing record in bowl games. This year so far the head to head is 2-3 SEC and that’s with a fluke Vandy win in week one.  I see the ACC taking another head to head winning season after next week.  The SEC is mostly hype with 3 good teams, in my opinion.  But to say any ACC team would get exposed I believe is a stretch 
    • What the hell?  How is presenting Cam's stats hating him?  The point is not to hate Cam, it is to show you how similar Jones is to him and why you take a look at him.  I mentioned Jones has the skill set to take a look--the response is, "look at his 5 years of performance."  So I compare him to the greatest QB in franchise history, and the stats are similar--while Jones was in a worse situation.  Now that is "hating?"  Come on.  This is a meritless, ignorant, personal attack because you are wrong.  Just stop it.  You all attack the poster when you have nothing.  So saying "we should consider a guy with similar stats and size to Cam Newton" is now hating Cam and making me a Jones super fan- that is just stupid.  
×
×
  • Create New...